http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync)
contain the following tarballs for approval
httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5]
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd 2.2.4
Let the voting begin, and kick off 2.2.5 eff
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:19 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This hack to locate httpd-prefix/build directory, instead of apr-
prefix/build
where libtool resides, causes apxs to break.
It might be good to note that 2.2.x and trunk get this right. I have
no idea where the installed build/config_
Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:50:51PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> It seems like config_vars.mk is imagining something, we use apr's libtool.
>
> What is special about apr's libtool? (Can't we and apr just use
> recent libtool?)
Simple, apr installs libtool, configur
Sorry to be a pest with this easy question, but it's not documented, and
I'm having a hard time with this function.
Anyone?
Drew Bertola wrote:
Hi,
If I split a bucket using:
apr_bucket_split(b, offset)
what exactly happens to the two pieces?
My impression is that b is now the head piece
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&sortby=date&revision=104019
is a complete disaster to Win32 as-a-service. It works fine from the
command line, but the lack of stdout/stderr channels causes cmd.exe
"in a service" appear to cause the CreateProcess of cmd.exe to implode.
As I look at it, the
We have positive confirmation now that this solution restores the behavior
of httpd 2.2.3, reverting one small aspect of the post-2.2.3 major overhaul
of mod_isapi (return OK from the handler).
Although the introduction of the debugging messages is new (not a reversion),
I will go ahead and backpo
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:50:51PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> It seems like config_vars.mk is imagining something, we use apr's libtool.
What is special about apr's libtool? (Can't we and apr just use
recent libtool?)
Cheers,
Patrick
AFAICT --enable-authn-dbd does not imply --enable-dbd. Should it? (More of
a question of taste..)
Cheers,
Patrick
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 07:25:59PM -0800, Chris Darroch wrote:
>Thanks -- we have a crusty old gcc on one machine, so I didn't notice
> these. Also, I see that the p variable in dbd_param() is unused in the
> non-threaded version and throws up a warning as well. With luck this
> should fix th
