Re: 3.0 - Proposed Goals

2007-02-19 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:33:27 -0800 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, I've been kicking around some ideas about where I personally would like trunk to go for a couple months now. You've missed the most important consideration here. Namely, don't break everything that's gone before.

ReCap: 2.2.4 windows binary w/ssl - server certificates

2007-02-19 Thread Marc Stern
For info, I developed for the Belgian government, a reverse proxy installation script (Unix/Windows) that encompasses a certificate creation, and its registration in the config file. This uses gawk. It is available on http://www.belgium.be/zip/eid_authentication_proxy_fr.html Another

Re: 3.0 - Proposed Goals

2007-02-19 Thread Graham Leggett
On Mon, February 19, 2007 11:44 am, Nick Kew wrote: You've missed the most important consideration here. Namely, don't break everything that's gone before. Specifically, a big -1 on forcing substantial rewrites of existing applications. Or in other words, the API must continue to work

Re: ReCap: 2.2.4 windows binary w/ssl?

2007-02-19 Thread Graham Leggett
On Mon, February 19, 2007 6:01 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The reason for http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/win32-msi/ to remain out-of-tree (and for goodness sakes, the reason to REMOVE the .pkg and .rpm generation sources) is that packaging after the tree is tagged is largely

Remove dead defines in util_ldap.c

2007-02-19 Thread David Jones
Several defines in util_ldap for certificate file types are no longer used and can be deleted, They were moved to apr_ldap_option.h with the APR_ prefix added Here's a subset of the defines now in apr_ldap_option.h: /** CA certificate type unknown */ #define APR_LDAP_CA_TYPE_UNKNOWN0 /**

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

2007-02-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 2/15/07, David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently util_ldap.c has a hard coded -1 as the search limit value (meaning infinite/no limit) on ldap_search_ext_s() calls. Some platforms cannot handle the -1, but need a 0. Linux, zoS (and others) have a LDAP_NO_LIMIT value in ldap.h. Below

Re: ReCap: 2.2.4 windows binary w/ssl?

2007-02-19 Thread Sander Temme
On Feb 18, 2007, at 8:01 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Everyone agrees that a batch file or something that would help the users make a server certificate would be goodness; this isn't a win32-specific issue, either, if you examine the most FAQ'ed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe we ship

RE: 3.0 - Proposed Goals

2007-02-19 Thread Peter J. Cranstone
So might I make a humble suggestion. Ask your 65 million customers what they would like in Apache 3.0 - this time around let someone else tell you what they want. It's the only way to build something. Peter J. Cranstone 5o9, Inc. 303.809.7342 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Making Web Applications

Re: 3.0 - Introduction

2007-02-19 Thread Mads Toftum
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:26:57PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: As long as we first teach httpd/Subversion how to deal with all of the spelling mistakes from us trying to spell out Dutch words. I want something easy to remember *and* type! -- justin How about: D That whole fascination

Re: 3.0 - Introduction

2007-02-19 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On 2/19/07, Mads Toftum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:26:57PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: As long as we first teach httpd/Subversion how to deal with all of the spelling mistakes from us trying to spell out Dutch words. I want something easy to remember *and* type!

HTTPD Board report

2007-02-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
Since the last report in November, we have seen 2 software releases: o httpd 2.2.4 o mod_python 3.3.1 2 new codebases are making their way into the project; mod_ftp has been accepted for graduation from the Incubator (this will also be reported in the Incubator report next month) and the

Re: 3.0 - Introduction

2007-02-19 Thread Sander Temme
On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Mads Toftum wrote: That whole fascination with Dutch things seem pretty silly random idea. Well, we, the community, *are* going there in just over two months, and I assume that we'll have at least a BOF to gather input/discussion. S. (/me volunteers to put

Re: 3.0 - Proposed Goals

2007-02-19 Thread Sander Temme
On Feb 19, 2007, at 1:44 AM, Nick Kew wrote: The breakage between 1.x and 2.0 was far too much. If we do it again, the world will rightly conclude that Apache is not a solution fit for the long term. +1. While it's fun and rewarding to hack on advanced stuff in its own right, the project

Re: 3.0 - Proposed Goals

2007-02-19 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Sander Temme wrote: On Feb 19, 2007, at 1:44 AM, Nick Kew wrote: The breakage between 1.x and 2.0 was far too much. If we do it again, the world will rightly conclude that Apache is not a solution fit for the long term. +1. While it's fun and rewarding to hack

Re: HTTPD Board report

2007-02-19 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Feb 19, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Since the last report in November, we have seen 2 software releases: o httpd 2.2.4 o mod_python 3.3.1 2 new codebases are making their way into the project; mod_ftp has been accepted for graduation from the Incubator (this will also be