Re: What do you think about Lighttpd?

--- steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use it too, and have meddled with it enough at a source level to feel comfortable running it. It has obvious, documented, problems (don't use it with mod_ssl), I didn't make it clear earlier -- I do use the event mpm. Successfully. What *is* the

Re: [PATCH 39299] - Patch review request

Thanks Nick for responding to my request. My comments are in between. On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:49:48PM +, Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:31:19 -0800 Basant Kukreja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am Basant. I work in web tier group in Sun Microsystems Inc. I have

Re: What do you think about Lighttpd?

Ah, OK so I shouldn't panic until a browser ships with pipelining enabled by default. HTTP pipelining would be nice, as in limited tests, it had a nice performance increase on sites with lots of little images/css/etc. On 3/1/07, Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- steve [EMAIL

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

How about: changes to apr_ldap.h.in: #define APR_HAS_ZOS_LDAPSDK @apu_has_ldap_zos@ #if APR_LDAP_HAS_ZOS_LDAPSDK #define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT LDAP_NO_LIMIT #else #ifdef LDAP_DEFAULT_LIMIT #define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT LDAP_DEFAULT_LIMIT #else #define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT -1 /* equivalent to

Re: [PATCH 39299] - Patch review request

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 2. März 2007 02:15 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH 39299] - Patch review request Thanks Nick for responding to my request. My comments are in between. On Wed, Feb