Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer

On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 08:30 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > Georg von Zezschwitz wrote: > > > > As I (with Rüdigers help :-) ) found out, there is already a bug report > > to my problem: > > #41897 describes the problem that the case-sensitivity of the > > "stickysession"-Parameter > > does not comp

Re: concern about memory management

afaik, apache does not offer a proper free() function, which might cause problems with image processing modules(if you're processing multiple images per connection). so i'd not attempt to hack that library only to get the same functionality as before. your call, though. Sam Carleton wrote: Fo

Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jean-Frederic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. April 2007 11:32 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer > > > On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 08:30 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > > Georg vo

Re: concern about memory management

On 4/3/07, Burak Arslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: afaik, apache does not offer a proper free() function, which might cause problems with image processing modules(if you're processing multiple images per connection). so i'd not attempt to hack that library only to get the same functionality as be

Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer

Plüm wrote: IMHO adding config parameters is no blocker for a backport. I was under different perception. It is probably more easy to add balancer->stickyurl = "jsessionid" when balancer->sticky is "JSESSIONID" and NULL otherwise. Or in get_path_param() test for "jsessionid" when balanc

Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer

On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 15:06 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > Plüm wrote: > > > > > > IMHO adding config parameters is no blocker for a backport. > > I was under different perception. > > > > >> It is probably more easy to add balancer->stickyurl = > >> "jsessionid" when > >> balancer->sticky is "J

Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer

Jean-Frederic wrote: We could do that then by using existing directive and decide during configure time. For example: stickysession="JSESSIONID [C]" stickysession=";jsessionid [P]" Does that mean that stickysession="JSESSIONID" will work as it does now? Yes. I don't think we need "Case in

Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer

Mladen Turk schrieb: Georg von Zezschwitz wrote: .. #41897 describes the problem that the case-sensitivity of the "stickysession"-Parameter does not comply to the Java Servlet Spec (Cookie: "JSESSIONID", url based session management ";jsessionid"). This is not the breakage of the Servlet-Spe

Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb: Good day! Sorry for rather long letter, but this is the summary from numerous discuissions and I really tried to make it short. ... Hi. RFC2518bis allows the Destination header to be just an absolute path for exactly that reason (see