Re: Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: news Im Auftrag von Bill Barker > Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juni 2007 05:07 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http? > > > > > Not strictly true, it's just that it's never graduated from > "experimental" > due to lac

Re: rewrite url with query string causing issues

Hi, I will also add if there is known issue with this API call ap_parse_uri(request_rec * r, const char * uri) is there any work around available. Waitin for replies. Thanx in advance Sonia On 6/14/07, sonia mukherjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Thanx for the reply, i am already usin

Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?

"Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Bill Stoddard >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28 >> An: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http? >> >> >> I'm trying to understan

Question regarding apache and locale (use of mbtowc in apache modules)

Apache typically runs in "C"/"POSIX" locale. Is it possible/recommended to run apache in other locale? Why I am asking is that if some apache module wants to use mbtowc functions (wchar.h), is it ok to use it (as it affects the entire process)? Is it recommended? Will it cause any issues with other

Thread Creation/Destruction Problems

I'm running the following code inside of an apache module (actually inside of a web service running inside an apache module): apr_thread_t *thd_arr; apr_pool_create(&ai->mp, NULL); apr_threadattr_t *thd_attr; apr_threadattr_create(&thd_attr, (ai->mp)); apr_threadattr_detach_set(thd_attr,1); apr_th

Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?

Bill Stoddard wrote: > I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides > that mod_proxy_http doesn't. > > ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector > a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental > performance improvement. obtai

Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?

On Thu, June 14, 2007 3:27 pm, Bill Stoddard wrote: > I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides > that mod_proxy_http doesn't. > > ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector > a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental >

Re: one word syncronize

On 14/06/07, Dmytro Fedonin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, Looking through 'server/mpm/worker/worker.c' I have found such a combination of TODO/FIXME comments: 1) /* TODO: requests_this_child should be synchronized - aaron */ if (requests_this_child <= 0) { 2) requests_this_child--; /* FIXME

Re: Apache Thread Creation/Destroy Problem

Croteau, Beau wrote: > The thread is created inside of the gsoap_handler. Though these threads > aren't necessarily mapped to a one to one gsoap_handler call. We have a > web service 'startup' function that creates several background threads > to do the processing and from there don't necessary h

RE: Apache Thread Creation/Destroy Problem

The thread is created inside of the gsoap_handler. Though these threads aren't necessarily mapped to a one to one gsoap_handler call. We have a web service 'startup' function that creates several background threads to do the processing and from there don't necessary have to have the gsoap_handler

one word syncronize once more

Hi all, I've got some response which shows that I was not clear enough in my previous post. Fullproof solution would be: Index: server/mpm/worker/worker.c === --- server/mpm/worker/worker.c (revision 545597) +++ server/mpm/worker

Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Bill Stoddard > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http? > > > I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it > provides > that mod_proxy_http doesn't. > > ajp13

mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?

I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides that mod_proxy_http doesn't. ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental performance improvement. obtained at the expense of added c

RE: patch for spurious open attempt on ".../file.html/.htaccess"

Here's a proper diff, without the spacing issue. (It was actually a line terminator issue, caused by editing the file under Windows.) --- request.c-2.2.4 2007-06-14 06:47:44.850623600 -0400 +++ request.c 2007-06-13 21:34:01.659559100 -0400 @@ -931,12 +931,20 @@ #ifdef CASE_BLIND_FILESYSTEM

RE: patch for spurious open attempt on ".../file.html/.htaccess"

> The attached patch is the final one and applies to 2.2.4? Yes, that is the final patch. It is a diff from v.2.2.4. The indentation might not be quite correct after applying that patch. Due space-to-tab conversion issues with my editor, I had to do a "diff -u -b", and the patch is not correctl

Re: patch for spurious open attempt on ".../file.html/.htaccess"

onsdag 13 juni 2007 skrev Allen Pulsifer: The attached patch is the final one and applies to 2.2.4? -- Regards // Oden Eriksson --- server/request.c 2006-07-12 05:38:44.0 +0200 +++ server/request.c.oden 2007-06-14 09:35:48.0 +0200 @@ -931,13 +931,21 @@ #ifdef CASE_BLIND_FILESYST

ap_hook_monitor example

Hi, I'm looking for an example of module code that uses the monitor hook. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, Mark Humphries

one word syncronize

Hi all, Looking through 'server/mpm/worker/worker.c' I have found such a combination of TODO/FIXME comments: 1) /* TODO: requests_this_child should be synchronized - aaron */ if (requests_this_child <= 0) { 2) requests_this_child--; /* FIXME: should be synchronized - aaron */ And I can not see