Re: mod_authn_dbd - internal server error after certain idle time

2007-07-09 Thread Tom Donovan
Danie Qian wrote: It is working a little better now after I set both DBDKeep and DBDMin to zero. But I am still getting the internal server error from time to time. Users usually can get pass the error by reloading the same page. Here is the error messages in the log: [Sat Jul 07

Re: mod_authn_dbd - internal server error after certain idle time

2007-07-09 Thread Danie Qian
- Original Message - From: Tom Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:29 AM Subject: Re: mod_authn_dbd - internal server error after certain idle time Danie Qian wrote: With this patch, setting DBDTimout lower than the MySQL

Re: mod_authn_dbd - internal server error after certain idle time

2007-07-09 Thread Tom Donovan
Danie Qian wrote: Thank you for the kind words. I am a little overwhelmed by the complexity of mod_dbd.c, especially its use of dbd_group_t. I couldnt find any notes for it so I wish someone here could shed some light on it for me and anyone interested. There do not seem to any group-related

Re: Apache Service Control

2007-07-09 Thread Q Beukes
Thanks for your quick response. Nick Kew wrote: To restart the process you need to send a HUP signal. This works fine, but what if you want to stop the server for a moment and then start it again, perhaps doing something in the mean while. This cannot be automated unless you

Re: apr_table_setn in mod_proxy_balancer.c

2007-07-09 Thread jean-frederic clere
Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 06/27/2007 05:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, In mod_proxy_balancer.c there is the following code: +++ /* Add the session route to request notes if present */ if (route) { apr_table_setn(r-notes, session-sticky, (*balancer)-sticky);

Re: apr_table_setn in mod_proxy_balancer.c

2007-07-09 Thread jean-frederic clere
jean-frederic clere wrote: Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 06/27/2007 05:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, In mod_proxy_balancer.c there is the following code: +++ /* Add the session route to request notes if present */ if (route) { apr_table_setn(r-notes, session-sticky,

Re: apr_table_setn in mod_proxy_balancer.c

2007-07-09 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: jean-frederic clere Gesendet: Montag, 9. Juli 2007 16:29 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: apr_table_setn in mod_proxy_balancer.c jean-frederic clere wrote: Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 06/27/2007 05:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi,

Re: mod_authn_dbd - internal server error after certain idle time

2007-07-09 Thread Danie Qian
- Original Message - From: Tom Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 10:09 AM Subject: Re: mod_authn_dbd - internal server error after certain idle time Danie Qian wrote: It is working a little better now after I set both DBDKeep and DBDMin

mod_auth_ntlm_winbind needs hosting

2007-07-09 Thread Dmitry Butskoy
There is a module, mod_auth_ntlm_winbind, which allows to authenticate users against a Windows domain using NTLM and Negotiate authentication mechanisms. The module uses a way, recommended by the Samba team -- it utilizes a special helper program ntlm_auth, which interacts with Samba's winbind

Re: mod_authn_dbd - internal server error after certain idle time

2007-07-09 Thread Tom Donovan
Danie Qian wrote: With this patch, setting DBDTimout lower than the MySQL system variable 'wait_timeout' will ensure than expired connections never get used. Assuming by DBDTimeout you mean DBDExptime in mod_dbd documentation where it implies a keepalive value, how about making mod_dbd

Re: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind needs hosting

2007-07-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Dmitry Butskoy wrote: Samba team think that this code is not something Samba-related (see http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-June/054186.html). Actually, it is Apache's httpd-related. Hence it have to be hosted somewhere in apache.org ... The issue with hosting at Apache,

Re: svn commit: r554685 - /httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/dev/release.xml

2007-07-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Before I SVN up to the site, some quick eyeballs on my changes r554684 and this commit? It's been very confusing as I refer incubating people back to this document, while pounding the +3 votes before a release ASF-wide policy. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Mon Jul 9 08:37:38

Re: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind needs hosting

2007-07-09 Thread Dmitry Butskoy
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Dmitry Butskoy wrote: Samba team think that this code is not something Samba-related (see http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-June/054186.html). Actually, it is Apache's httpd-related. Hence it have to be hosted

module testing

2007-07-09 Thread Mike
Do any unit test/mock object frameworks exist for doing module testing? Thanks

Re: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind needs hosting

2007-07-09 Thread Dmitry Butskoy
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Yet and still, there is the minor issue that NTLM violates RFC2616, and as such you might find resistance here :) OTOH, such a module allows to choose a Linux/UNIX server for web or proxy, even in strong Windows environment (where users must be authenticated

Re: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind needs hosting

2007-07-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Dmitry Butskoy wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Yet and still, there is the minor issue that NTLM violates RFC2616, and as such you might find resistance here :) OTOH, such a module allows to choose a Linux/UNIX server for web or proxy, even in strong Windows environment (where users

Re: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind needs hosting

2007-07-09 Thread Dmitry Butskoy
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: On that note - I suppose this would not be enabled by default, so I have a little less concern. Hmm... I mean to host this module somewhere near the Apache (f.e. at Apache site), and check it by Apache team. But I feel you think about inclusion into standard

PID table backport TR?

2007-07-09 Thread Sander Temme
Gang, Is anyone working on a backport of the PID table stuff (r551843 on trunk I think) to the 2.0.x and 2.2.x branches? I think that'd need to go in before we do the long-awaited much rumored tag roll. I could do some work on that... does anyone have any code to test that change? Thoughts?