undefined reference to `ap_log_error'

I'm trying to compile two Apache modules: mod_atom (http://www.tbray.org/code/mod_atom.tgz) and mod_gnutls (http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_gnutls/) In both cases, I'm getting similar errors: [...] i486-linux-gnu-gcc -shared .libs/mod_atom_la-mod_atom.o .libs/mod_atom_la-genx. o

Re: undefined reference to `ap_log_error'

Jack Bates wrote: mod_atom.c:(.text+0x2aa): undefined reference to `ap_log_error' .libs/mod_atom_la-mod_atom.o: In function `type_checker': mod_atom.c:(.text+0x51a): undefined reference to `ap_regexec' ap_log_error (Apache 1.3) was replaced with ap_log_rerror or ap_log_perror in Apache 2.x -

Re: undefined reference to `ap_log_error'

On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:34:42 -0700 Joe Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jack Bates wrote: mod_atom.c:(.text+0x2aa): undefined reference to `ap_log_error' .libs/mod_atom_la-mod_atom.o: In function `type_checker': mod_atom.c:(.text+0x51a): undefined reference to `ap_regexec' ap_log_error

Re: undefined reference to `ap_log_error'

On Dec 4, 2007 3:27 PM, Jack Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Wl,-z -Wl ,defs -z defs Normally when creating a non-symbolic shared library, undefined symbols are allowed and left to be resolved by the runtime loader. These options disallows such undefined symbols. -- Eric Covener

Re: undefined reference to `ap_log_error'

On Dec 4, 2007 4:03 PM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 4, 2007 3:27 PM, Jack Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Wl,-z -Wl ,defs -z defs Normally when creating a non-symbolic shared library, undefined symbols are allowed and left to be resolved by the runtime loader. These

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Invalid URI in request

Hi Krushna, Thanks for the quick update.It comes in my error_log.I am using Apache 2.2Worker in Red-hat 3. Regards -A On Dec 4, 2007 6:04 PM, Rath, Krushna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can u provide bit more info…..where r u getting Invalid URI in request.?in ethereal? Can u provide the trace

Invalid URI in request

Hi All, I am getting lot of Invalid URI in request.How to resolve this.I have checked the DocumentRoot and Directory they are all pointing to same path. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks and regards -A

[PATCH] Case insensitive username matching for WIN32 and BS2000 (and OS2?)

Hi, The usernames in WIN32 are, IIRC , case insensitive (and they are in BS2000, and perhaps in OS2?). Some of the username auth code uses tables, and thus case insensitive matching, but at some places, user names are compared literally. The appended patch tries to make these literal

Re: [PATCH] Case insensitive username matching for WIN32 and BS2000 (and OS2?)

Hi Martin, The usernames in WIN32 are, IIRC , case insensitive (and they are in BS2000, and perhaps in OS2?). when authenticating against system accounts then NetWare is insensitive too. Some of the username auth code uses tables, and thus case insensitive matching, but at some places, user

Re: [PATCH] Case insensitive username matching for WIN32 and BS2000 (and OS2?)

On Dec 4, 2007 11:54 AM, Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Martin, The usernames in WIN32 are, IIRC , case insensitive (and they are in BS2000, and perhaps in OS2?). when authenticating against system accounts then NetWare is insensitive too. Some of the username auth code uses

Re: [PATCH] Case insensitive username matching for WIN32 and BS2000 (and OS2?)

On Dec 4, 2007 5:15 AM, Martin Kraemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The usernames in WIN32 are, IIRC , case insensitive (and they are in BS2000, and perhaps in OS2?). I don't get it - why should usernames be case-insensitive? There's no involvement of the Win32 (OS/2, z/OS, Netware, etc.) API here