Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Takashi Sato wrote: On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:00:46 -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Apache HTTP Server fans, The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. "./build.sh" is not enough. "./build.sh all" is needed for 2.0, an

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Takashi Sato
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:00:46 -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apache HTTP Server fans, > > The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40, > 2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. These are not updated in 2.2: manual/mod/quickreference.html.ko.euc-kr manual/mod/d

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Sander Temme
On Jan 5, 2008, at 5:20 PM, Nick Kew wrote: Do you mean as in tcpdump -x? I've uploaded a pair of dumps (one of client-proxy, the other of proxy-server) at the same location. The best way to get a tcpdump file for analysing in Wireshark, do: tcpdump -i lo0 (or whatever) -s 0 -w your.output

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 + Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40, > > 2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. > > Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses. Since wrowe asked me in IRC, I tested 2.0.62. It does

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On sön, 2008-01-06 at 01:20 +, Nick Kew wrote: > Do you mean as in tcpdump -x? I've uploaded a pair of dumps > (one of client-proxy, the other of proxy-server) at the same > location. tcpdump -p -i any -s 1600 -w traffic.pcap port 80 Regards Henrik

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:28:33 +0100 Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 01/05/2008 07:04 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100 > > Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Ok. Can you setup a tcpdump between proxy and server and between > >> client a

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 12:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:11:07 +0100 > Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar ball fixes the problem? >>> Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response. >> S

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Guenter Knauf wrote: Furthermore if we would introduce an APR_VERSION_NUMBER like: #define APR_VERSION_NUMBER \ (APR_MAJOR_VERSION * 100) + \ (APR_MINOR_VERSION * 1000) + \ APR_PATCH_VERSION we could do much easier version tests ABI and API versioning policy prohibits

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, >> >> or should we do similar in ftp_commands.c depending on >> MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER ? > The patch I committed for 0.9.2 tests the APR version, which the > real test of this function's availability. seen, that should be ok. However I came over this already with other (external) modules, so ask

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, > OK - here's my thought for 0.9.2 (not really a showstopper for this > alpha release); >* it's supposed to be as simple as copying over an existing httpd > source tree. For win32, that means (minimum) you touch Apache.dsw > and Makefile.win. Maybe ship those as a patch? It's

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, > Need 2 +1's beyond my own to remove STATUS-FTP from the packages. you have my +1 now already - since we dont ship STATUS with httpd packages either. Guen.

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Oden Eriksson
Den Friday 04 January 2008 21.00.46 skrev Jim Jagielski: > Apache HTTP Server fans, > > The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40, > 2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. The test tarballs are available > for testing and feedback at the below location. Everyone is reminded >

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Steffen wrote: mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7 Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822 FAILS Rebuilding mod_perl with latest SVN snapshot 2.0.4-dev against 2.2.7 and use *only* the new generated mod_perl.so, it is working except from command line. Since this problem (b

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Guenter Knauf wrote: or should we do similar in ftp_commands.c depending on MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER ? The patch I committed for 0.9.2 tests the APR version, which the real test of this function's availability.

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Steffen
mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7 Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822 FAILS Rebuilding mod_perl with latest SVN snapshot 2.0.4-dev against 2.2.7 and use *only* the new generated mod_perl.so, it is working except from command line. Since this problem (bug 43534) is

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Sounds good to me. I compiled a few 3rd party modules on windows and most are not intree compiling. So I don't see it as a big loss if mod_ftpd doesn't compile in tree on windows. On Jan 5, 2008 8:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guenter Knauf wrote: > > > >> I got a few n

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Guenter Knauf wrote: I got a few notes on this though: 1) in the 2.0 tree is there a loggers subfolder in the source tree? I'm not sure been a long time since I looked at it. 2) APACHE2_HOME points to the install dir of apache and not to the source IIRC? so there wouldn't be a modules subfolder

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 07:04 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100 > Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ok. Can you setup a tcpdump between proxy and server and between >> client and proxy? I guess the network traces would be very helpful in >> finding out where things are

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On Jan 5, 2008 7:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Donovan wrote: > > Yes, the crash dissappears. > > > > I built with MS Visual Studio 8 on win2k and tested on win2k, winxp, and > > vista. > > > > ab -n 10 -c 100 http://localhost/large_file.html > > > > Where large

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
I actualy like that the status files are packed, why aren't they packed for the other packages? But I'd say do what the others do. On Jan 5, 2008 8:14 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guenter Knauf wrote: > > > >> See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.1/S

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please fetch up the newly prepared httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1.tar.gz, or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1-crlf.zip (and their md5/asc sigs) from: [X] +1 to release as 0.9.1-alpha If the announce states this is an alpha for httpd-2.2 I don't see

Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Guenter Knauf wrote: See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.1/STATUS-FTP first line of STATUS reads: MOD_FTP 3.0 STATUS: a little bit strange the 3.0 while the module has now 0.9.1 version Fixed. I would be happy to reroll without STATUS if people agree that it sho

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Tom Donovan wrote: Yes, the crash dissappears. I built with MS Visual Studio 8 on win2k and tested on win2k, winxp, and vista. ab -n 10 -c 100 http://localhost/large_file.html Where large_file.html is 200kb. No continued memory growth observed (after the first few seconds), so I don'

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Steffen wrote: Building fine with GUI on VS 2005 out of the box. It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules and also when eg. "EnableMMAP off" is set: This was actually the win9x transaction pump, which is actually used by Win32DisableAcceptEx. EnableMMAP was something of a red h

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100 Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. Can you setup a tcpdump between proxy and server and between > client and proxy? I guess the network traces would be very helpful in > finding out where things are starting to get wrong. One testcase with its tcpdu

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Tom Donovan
Yes, the crash dissappears. I built with MS Visual Studio 8 on win2k and tested on win2k, winxp, and vista. Also tried it with: ab -n 10 -c 100 http://localhost/large_file.html Where large_file.html is 200kb. No continued memory growth observed (after the first few seconds), so I don't

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 03:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> 2. Excerpt from first test results: >> >> >> 1\r\n >> \r\r\n >> e\r\n >> 1\r\n >> z\r\n >> 1\r\n >> m\r\n >> 1\r\r\n >> 0\r\n >> \r\n >> >> >> This an invalid chunked encoding (\r is already the one byte that

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
I just recompiled with that patch. The crashes with are now indeed gone! So all is good it seems :) On Jan 5, 2008 5:09 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although I have limited knowledge in the Windows MPM the patch looks > reasonable. > I assume you have already tested that the cr

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On Jan 5, 2008 5:26 PM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With 2.2.7 on windows mod_perl is still not working, > 2.2.4 was the latest version where mod_perl was working. > > mod_perl with Apache as service crashes when starting Apache. > mod_perl with Apache cmd-line Apache starts but does not d

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Steffen
With 2.2.7 on windows mod_perl is still not working, 2.2.4 was the latest version where mod_perl was working. mod_perl with Apache as service crashes when starting Apache. mod_perl with Apache cmd-line Apache starts but does not dipslay a page, no signs in the logs. Rather as with 2.2.6 we prefe

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 05:00 PM, Tom Donovan wrote: > Steffen wrote: >> Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the >> conf. >> Steffen >> >>> On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote: It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules > ... \srclib\apr-util\bucke

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Tom Donovan
Steffen wrote: Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf. Steffen On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote: It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules ... \srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c + list 0x00b71f10 {pool=0x00b6ff08 allocator=0x

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:06:04 -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses. > > > > Just to be clear, is this a regression from 2.2.6 or > from just 2.2.6+ ? Both. And almost certainly from earlier versions. p.s. I'm just back at my de

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 4, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:00:46 -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Apache HTTP Server fans, The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. Regression: fails to proxy massively chun

Read and store file in module config

2008-01-05 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi group, For a new module I'm working on I need to read a short text file, parse it, and store it (parsed, of course) on my module's config, so I can use it on certain ap_hooks. What do you recommend for this? Just declare my par

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Agreed... trying to recreate here... On Jan 5, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 01/05/2008 11:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote: On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:37:53 +0100 Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 + Nick Kew <

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 11:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:37:53 +0100 > Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 + >>> Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Regression: fails to proxy massively chu

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Indeed with Win32DisableAcceptEx in there is bombs out :( Same location as Steffen On Jan 5, 2008 1:08 PM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf. > > Steffen > > > - Original Message - > From: "Ruediger Pluem" <[EMAI

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
That could explain why I'm not seeing it... I don't have Win32DisableAcceptEx in there. I'll report back later once I add it. On Jan 5, 2008 1:08 PM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf. > > Steffen > > > - Original Mes

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Steffen
Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf. Steffen - Original Message - From: "Ruediger Pluem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, 05 January, 2008 12:12 Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available On 0

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 12:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:11:07 +0100 > Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar ball fixes the problem? >>> Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response. >> S

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:11:07 +0100 Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar > >> ball fixes the problem? > > > > Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response. > > Sorry my first patch was bogus of course :

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Steffen
Here an example crashing in mod_logio: libaprutil-1.dll!apr_bucket_alloc(unsigned int size=40, apr_bucket_alloc_t * list=0x00b4c0f0) Line 135 C libaprutil-1.dll!apr_bucket_socket_create(apr_socket_t * p=0x00b4a140, apr_bucket_alloc_t * list=0x00b4c0f0) Line 104 C libhttpd.dll!ap_core_input_

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On Jan 5, 2008 11:36 AM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules > and also when eg. "EnableMMAP off" is set: > > \srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c > > + list 0x00b71f10 {pool=0x00b6ff08 allocator=0x freelist=0x > ...}

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote: > Building fine with GUI on VS 2005 out of the box. > > With the shipped httpd.conf " It works! " > > It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules > and also when eg. "EnableMMAP off" is set: > > \srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c >

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 11:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:47:40 +0100 > Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar ball >> fixes the problem? > > Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response. Sorry

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:47:40 +0100 Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar ball > fixes the problem? Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apac

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 11:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:37:53 +0100 > Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 + >>> Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Regression: fails to proxy massively chu

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Steffen
Building fine with GUI on VS 2005 out of the box. With the shipped httpd.conf " It works! " It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules and also when eg. "EnableMMAP off" is set: \srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c + list 0x00b71f10 {pool=0x00b6ff08 allocator=0x f

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:37:53 +0100 Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 + > > Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses. > > > > OK, it works correct

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 + > Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses. > > OK, it works correctly if I revert r602679 (no other changes). > Investigating further. It would be helpful if you