where did the configure script go?

2008-03-25 Thread greg boyington
Hello List, I hope this is a foolish question. When I check out the current libapreq2 via svn, I don't get a configure script: [ ~/tmp ] svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/apreq/trunk/ httpd-apreq-2 |grep configure Ahttpd-apreq-2/configure.ac Thus I cannot do the build:

Re: Sending large file as attachment to clients

2008-03-25 Thread Subra A Narayanan
Thanks for the replies guys. I will try ur suggestions once I get to work today. Just a few more questions: Check out the various filter/bucket brigade examples. This may do just what you want. I've used it to 'gate' the final sending for things ike throttling and keeping buggy telco bearer

Re: Sending large file as attachment to clients

2008-03-25 Thread Joe Lewis
Subra A Narayanan wrote: Thanks for the replies guys. I will try ur suggestions once I get to work today. Just a few more questions: Check out the various filter/bucket brigade examples. This may do just what you want. I've used it to 'gate' the final sending for things ike throttling and

Re: mod_disk_cache and atimes

2008-03-25 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Mar 24, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Skye Poier Nott wrote: Does mod_disk_cache use file atimes at all? I'd like to mount my cache filesystem noatime to see if it helps performance, if it's safe. No - it does not; so you get that speed increase (which is very noticable on a

Building Apache 2.2.6 on Windows with IPv6 support

2008-03-25 Thread Cesar Silveira
Hello all, I am trying to build Apache 2.2.6 for Windows (I'm using Windows XP Pro) with IPv6 support. In order to enable IPv6 support, I edited the apr.hw file under \srclib\apr\include and changed APR_HAVE_IPV6 to 1 at line 220. It all goes well, but the service is not getting started when

Re: mod_disk_cache and atimes

2008-03-25 Thread Akins, Brian
On 3/25/08 4:37 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No - it does not; so you get that speed increase (which is very noticable on a swapspace/ram-disk*). I'd like to see some numbers on that. I just did a quick test on Linux and saw no real improvement (testing our

Re: mod_disk_cache and atimes

2008-03-25 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Mar 25, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Akins, Brian wrote: No - it does not; so you get that speed increase (which is very noticable on a swapspace/ram-disk*). I'd like to see some numbers on that. I just did a quick test on Linux and saw no real improvement (testing our hacked-to-heck version).

Re: Re: mod_proxy / ProxyTimeout fix 2.0.63

2008-03-25 Thread Ronald Park
(I don't know why but I seem to be randomly kicked off this mailing list, so I apologize for breaking the thread chain on this topic and I apologize for the lateness of this reply but random events are conspiring against me...) On Mar 4, 2008 16:38:45 GMT, Jim Jagielski wrote: Looking over

Re: mod_disk_cache and atimes

2008-03-25 Thread Akins, Brian
On 3/25/08 12:54 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Though if anyone can find me some more serious hardware* - I'd love to do this proper; as I am struggling getting a fixed mod_memm_cache and mod_memcached_cache to be taxed hard enough to actually measure/ profile sensibly

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-03-25 Thread James M. Leddy
Guy Ferraiolo wrote: Folks Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me know. Guy Flood looks to be a dead project. I've been using it for the past few weeks, but it crashes on my x86_64 system and there isn't a bugzilla in which to file a report. Is there

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-03-25 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 03/25/2008 08:04 PM, James M. Leddy wrote: Guy Ferraiolo wrote: Folks Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me know. Guy Flood looks to be a dead project. I've been using it for the past few weeks, but it crashes on my x86_64 system and there isn't a

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-03-25 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
It runs find on one of our x86_64 machines. On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 15:04 -0400, James M. Leddy wrote: Guy Ferraiolo wrote: Folks Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me know. Guy Flood looks to be a dead project. I've been using it for the past

Re: where did the configure script go?

2008-03-25 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 12:50 -0400, greg boyington wrote: I hope this is a foolish question. When I check out the current libapreq2 via svn, I don't get a configure script: Run ./buildconf. -- Bojan

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-03-25 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
It runs fine on one of our x86_64 machines. I'd be glad to take responsibility. Guy On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 15:04 -0400, James M. Leddy wrote: Guy Ferraiolo wrote: Folks Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me know. Guy Flood looks to be a dead

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-03-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: Can someone with Bugzilla karma please add Flood as a component to the Apache httpd-2 product? Please, no. A Flood 'project', a httpd-test 'project' with a flood 'component', or an httpd 'project' with new subprojects. But flood is unrelated to httpd-2, and isn't

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-03-25 Thread James M. Leddy
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Ruediger Pluem wrote: Can someone with Bugzilla karma please add Flood as a component to the Apache httpd-2 product? Please, no. A Flood 'project', a httpd-test 'project' with a flood 'component', or an httpd 'project' with new subprojects. Thank you for making