Hi,
I am facing problem about how to share context between input filter and
output filter which are registered through different hooks.
Here is description of the problem:
static void
mod_realsecure_register_hooks (apr_pool_t * p)
{
ap_hook_child_init
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
3. Binding votes:
0 -1
0 +0
8 +1 (Colm, Sander Temme, Brad, Jim, Bill, Lars, Jeff, Ruediger)
So the vote has
On 12/17/2008 12:38 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
The errno assignments you added did the trick.
Unfortunately, I'm still missing the overall goal. I have many proxy
balance members like:
BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8010 route=tomcat1 min=16 max=80
smax=40 ttl=900 keepalive=Off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Paul Querna wrote:
Screw the old dead projects, we already have the blessing of the 'most
recent' mod_lua name owner in the Kepler project, so lets just use it
and move on, maybe with a small note in the docs about the old modules.
I agree...
I think to tie it to a version is bad too. And could be very confusing.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Greg Stein gst...@apache.org wrote:
I think it would be a bad idea to tie it to a specific version.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 19:59, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
Another
Hi,
I am facing problem about how to share context between input filter and
output filter which are registered through different hooks.
Here is description of the problem:
static void
mod_realsecure_register_hooks (apr_pool_t * p)
{
ap_hook_child_init
Hello All,
I am trying to add tproxy4
(http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/) support to
the mod_proxy to achieve transparency. It basically involves a kernel
patch which allows binding of a socket to foreign address among other
things. At the app layer we only need to set the
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
3. Binding votes:
0 -1
0 +0
8 +1 (Colm,
I'd prefer mod_core_lua over mod_script_lua.
I don't really see a problem with mod_luau either, LoadModule directives are
usually added to the config if the module is built so I don't think typo's
will be a big issue.
~Jorge
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
bikeshed color=red
mod_{script,core,lang}_lua are too long and expressive.
Just use mod_lua.
Screw the old dead projects, we already have the blessing of the 'most
recent' mod_lua name owner in the Kepler project, so lets just use it
and move on, maybe with a small note in the docs about the
Pranav Desai wrote:
I am trying to add tproxy4
(http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/) support to
the mod_proxy to achieve transparency. It basically involves a kernel
patch which allows binding of a socket to foreign address among other
things. At the app layer we only need
Hi all,
Does anyone know if the information at
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/0.9
is available in a printable format for reading off paper? I generally
find things easier to read like that. Or does anyone have know of a
resource that's similar and easy to read?
--
The ATM to the bathroom
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Pranav Desai wrote:
I am trying to add tproxy4
(http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/) support to
the mod_proxy to achieve transparency. It basically involves a kernel
patch which allows binding of a
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
How many are we talking about (in the significant category)? The
easiest way probably depends on how many people, how easy they are
to contact, etc.
Ryan, do you have a rough sense of this?
From my own review of the ChangeLog, it looks like there are
roughly
14 matches
Mail list logo
