William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
How many are we talking about (in the significant category)? The
easiest way probably depends on how many people, how easy they are
to contact, etc.
Ryan, do you have a rough sense of this?
From my own review of the ChangeLog, it looks like there are
roughly a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Pranav Desai wrote:
>
>> I am trying to add tproxy4
>> (http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/) support to
>> the mod_proxy to achieve transparency. It basically involves a kernel
>> patch which allows binding of a socket
Hi all,
Does anyone know if the information at
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/0.9
is available in a printable format for reading off paper? I generally
find things easier to read like that. Or does anyone have know of a
resource that's similar and easy to read?
--
The ATM to the bathroom is
Pranav Desai wrote:
I am trying to add tproxy4
(http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/) support to
the mod_proxy to achieve transparency. It basically involves a kernel
patch which allows binding of a socket to foreign address among other
things. At the app layer we only need
Hello All,
I am trying to add tproxy4
(http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/) support to
the mod_proxy to achieve transparency. It basically involves a kernel
patch which allows binding of a socket to foreign address among other
things. At the app layer we only need to set the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Paul Querna wrote:
> Screw the old dead projects, we already have the blessing of the 'most
> recent' mod_lua name owner in the Kepler project, so lets just use it
> and move on, maybe with a small note in the docs about the old modules.
I agree...
Hi,
I am facing problem about how to share context between input filter and
output filter which are registered through different hooks.
Here is description of the problem:
static void
mod_realsecure_register_hooks (apr_pool_t * p)
{
ap_hook_child_init (realsecure_child_init,
mod_{script,core,lang}_lua are too long and expressive.
Just use mod_lua.
Screw the old dead projects, we already have the blessing of the 'most
recent' mod_lua name owner in the Kepler project, so lets just use it
and move on, maybe with a small note in the docs about the old modules.
-P
I'd prefer mod_core_lua over mod_script_lua.
I don't really see a problem with mod_luau either, LoadModule directives are
usually added to the config if the module is built so I don't think typo's
will be a big issue.
~Jorge
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1
I think to tie it to a version is bad too. And could be very confusing.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I think it would be a bad idea to tie it to a specific version.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 19:59, Brian McCallister wrote:
> > Another suggestion from the lua mailing l
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Bing Swen wrote:
>
> "Jim Jagielski" wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
>>> 3. Binding votes:
>>>
>>> 0 -1
>>> 0 +0
>>> 8 +1 (Colm, San
On 12/17/2008 12:38 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
> The errno assignments you added did the trick.
>
> Unfortunately, I'm still missing the overall goal. I have many proxy
> balance members like:
>
>BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8010 route=tomcat1 min=16 max=80
>smax=40 ttl=900 keepalive=Off
"Jim Jagielski" wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
3. Binding votes:
0 -1
0 +0
8 +1 (Colm, Sander Temme, Brad, Jim, Bill, Lars, Jeff, Ruediger)
So the vote has passed.
I will
13 matches
Mail list logo
