Re: helloworld module won't load

2009-03-31 Thread Sorin Manolache
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 07:44, Richard Langly richard.ringo.lan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm running gentoo and trying to see my helloworld module which I got from the apache modules book. So I try to hit http://10.0.2.20/helloworld, but nothing happens exept that I get a 'file does not exist' in

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Maybe a more layered approach would be something to consider for 3.0? Seems to me that the layers and groups of modules keeps expanding and expanding. 2.0 - 2.2 had the whole auth move over so maybe it's time to rethink the current module system for 3.0? ~Jorge On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:25

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Bertrand Mansion
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:25 AM, M. Brian Akins br...@akins.org wrote: As I hack on some lua stuff, it's useful to have the symbols for functions.  That may just be because I'm lazy, because I could do optional function lookups in library opens, I suppose.  OT, but I like my Lua glue in a lua

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Querna Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. März 2009 01:37 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: what is in modules vs what is in the core mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expose additional functions to the API. (mod_proxy and

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Mladen Turk
Paul Querna wrote: mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expose additional functions to the API. (mod_proxy and mod_cache do too!) So, you came back from different direction, cool :) If you really like to put the watchdog functionality inside the mpm (and IMO that's

Re: svn commit: r760167 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

2009-03-31 Thread Nick Kew
On 30 Mar 2009, at 23:48, Roy T. Fielding wrote: -1 (veto) Reverted. Filling obscure areas of the server with stupid hacks that modify the request structure because of something the content generator *might* do is harmful to overall stability. Up to a point, Lord Copper. There are a

Re: [PATCH] mod_dbd with more than one pool

2009-03-31 Thread Kevac Marko
Nick, any news? On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote: Thanks.  I'll test-drive today. -- Marko Kevac

Re: Substitute bug

2009-03-31 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Nick Gearls nickgea...@gmail.com wrote: In a page containing only abcdef (inside the body), and the following directives,   Substitute  s~(abc.*)$~$1~q   Substitute  s~def~XXX~ the second directive should be ignored, because of the q flag on the first one.

Re: Substitute bug

2009-03-31 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
Hi Nick, the q does not guarantee that the second one is ignored. It only can happen that it is ignored. So if you have two Substitute lines use the q flag to ensure that it is not ignored. Regards Rüdiger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nick Gearls [mailto:nickgea...@gmail.com]

Substitute bug

2009-03-31 Thread Nick Gearls
In a page containing only abcdef (inside the body), and the following directives, Substitute s~(abc.*)$~$1~q Substitute s~def~XXX~ the second directive should be ignored, because of the q flag on the first one. The result should be abcdef. However, the result is abcXXX. Did I miss

Lua and memcache was Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Akins, Brian
OT, but will you contribute that to mod_lua ? :) Based on mod_memcache and mod_wombat . For demonstration only as this uses our hacked version, but you get the idea how simple this was. Build it in lua dir like /usr/lib/lua/5.1/apach2/memcache.so -- Brian Akins Chief Operations Engineer

Re: Lua and memcache was Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Bertrand Mansion
Le 31 mars 09 à 15:52, Akins, Brian a écrit : OT, but will you contribute that to mod_lua ? :) Based on mod_memcache and mod_wombat . For demonstration only as this uses our hacked version, but you get the idea how simple this was. Build it in lua dir like

RE: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread David Martínez Albiter
prueba -Original Message- From: Graham Leggett [mailto:minf...@sharp.fm] Sent: Lunes, 30 de Marzo de 2009 08:03 p.m. To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core Paul Querna wrote: mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that

Re: svn commit: r760167 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

2009-03-31 Thread Edward Z. Yang
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Filling obscure areas of the server with stupid hacks that modify the request structure because of something the content generator *might* do is harmful to overall stability. A common error in content generators is to have gzip compression enabled

ThreadStackSize quirk on Linux

2009-03-31 Thread Eric Covener
I'm finding that when I try to reduce the stack size with ThreadStackSize on recent linux systems, where ulimit -s is NOT unlimited (but very large, 10240K) , ThreadStackSize fails to have any effect (via pmap / ps -eFw). When ulimit -s is unlimited, and the default is very large, ThreadStackSize

Re: Lua and memcache was Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Akins, Brian
On 3/31/09 10:18 AM, Bertrand Mansion bmans...@mamasam.net wrote: Reading the comments in your code, it seems that mod_lua could benefit from a better error reporting ? Perhaps. Or I just needed to actually add error checking Right now I rely on the lua side to sanity check stuff. --

2.2.11 mod_include

2009-03-31 Thread Torsten Foertsch
Hi, my apache 2.2.11 does not pass the current httpd test framework: t/modules/include.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 88 Failed: 1) Failed test: 67 t/modules/info.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) Failed test: 1 t/modules/rewrite.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 29 Failed: 1) Failed test: 24

Re: 2.2.11 mod_include

2009-03-31 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
Torsten Foertsch wrote: [mod_include DATE_LOCAL bug] Is this a known bug? It's probably this one: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39369 ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht l...@eilebrecht.net

Apache 2.2, mod_ssl and Named Virtual Host

2009-03-31 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, Did you know if it's possible to use Named Virtual Host with SSL (mod_ssl) ? I got various replies : This article (in French), say it's possible (may be using a self signed certificate which is evil). http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/breves/ssl_virtualhosts.html.fr But for example

Re: Apache 2.2, mod_ssl and Named Virtual Host

2009-03-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Henri Gomez wrote: Did you know if it's possible to use Named Virtual Host with SSL (mod_ssl) ? Yes, of course, usually ill advised. Explaining that combination is usually much harder than simply stating no, it's not supported. Advices/experiences more than welcome. Beyond SNI (Server

Re: Apache 2.2, mod_ssl and Named Virtual Host

2009-03-31 Thread Henri Gomez
Thanks. Good to know it should works from experts ;) I hope thawte could provide us such wildcards certs or required pki stuff. Many thanks again ;) Le 31 mars 09 à 22:00, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Did you know if it's possible to use Named

HTTP over SCTP

2009-03-31 Thread Preethi Natarajan
Hello folks, We are trying to adapt HTTP to work over SCTP streams (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-natarajan-http-over-sctp-01). Since this proposal was received warmly at the httpbis WG, we are contemplating on a more formal specification of HTTP over SCTP. The current HTTP over SCTP design

Adopting mod_remoteip to modules/metadata/ ?

2009-03-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I have essentially finished mod_remoteip at this point and am looking to find out the interest level of adopting this as a core module into trunk (modules/metadata/ appears to be the most appropriate target)? mod_remoteip can deal with 2 situations effortlessly, one is the absolute

Re: HTTP over SCTP

2009-03-31 Thread Paul Querna
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Preethi Natarajan preethi@gmail.com wrote: Hello folks, We are trying to adapt HTTP to work over SCTP streams (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-natarajan-http-over-sctp-01). Since this proposal was received warmly at the httpbis WG, we are contemplating on