Considering that APR is looking at a release of 1.3 soon, I think
it's time to start the ball regarding 2.2.12. I offer to RM.
Also, I'd like to also look into another beta of mod_ftp and review
on whether the show-stopper should be considered one (I'd like to
get a 1.0.0 out).
On Fri, 22 May 2009 07:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
[ouch, just replied to bugs@ - sorry]
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30586
> --- Comment #1 from Dan Poirier 2009-05-22
> 07:38:14 PST --- It looks like this is still a potential issue in
> trunk.
Looks
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 02:39:57PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Given that the semantics of the options has changed, I don't think it's
> > worth changing httpd to maintain any pretence of compile-time or
> > run-time compatibility here. Any c
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 05:26:07PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> Attaching my original analysis for security@ which hopefully answers
> that question ;)
attempt 2
I've now had a deeper look into this. I can't see a way to fix the
problem without changing the semantics of the OPT_ bits used, as I
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <
> wr...@rowe-clan.net>
> > wrote:
> >> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >> > Does somebody else care to share their opinion on this? Which
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. > wrote:
>
>> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> > Does somebody else care to share their opinion on this? Which of these
>> > are okay?
>> >
>> > - existing mod_perl releases (and potentially o
On Fri 22 May 2009, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Hmmm, after trying to use what seems like a cool feature, I find that
> mod_perl was never taught to use the Apache 2's mod_include plug-in
> interface.
AFAIK, that is provided by Geoff's CPAN module Apache::IncludeHook or
so.
Torsten
--
Need professio
j...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Fri May 22 12:49:41 2009
> New Revision: 777499
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=777499&view=rev
> Log:
> No need (that I can see) to have the -FTP suffix here
-1 Veto, reverting. Not even LICENSE, which would normally be just
the AL 2.0 can
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Having thought about this longer, I do agree that it would be reasonable
> to provide OPT_INCNOEXEC as a noop integer for back-compat, but, it
> turns out we're out of bits - allow_options_t is an unsigned char and
> we're using 2^0 through 2^7 already. :(
The C langauge p
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Torsten Foertsch
wrote:
> On Fri 22 May 2009, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Hmmm, after trying to use what seems like a cool feature, I find that
> > mod_perl was never taught to use the Apache 2's mod_include plug-in
> > interface.
>
> AFAIK, that is provided by Geoff's
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Having thought about this longer, I do agree that it would be reasonable
> > to provide OPT_INCNOEXEC as a noop integer for back-compat, but, it
> > turns out we're out of bits - allow_options_t is an unsigned
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. > wrote:
>
>> Joe Orton wrote:
>> >
>> > Having thought about this longer, I do agree that it would be reasonable
>> > to provide OPT_INCNOEXEC as a noop integer for back-compat, but,
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Backing up a bit...
>
> I originally thought we could map bit values in 2.2.x to avoid affecting
> modules, but that isn't possible since includes-with-exec is two bits
> instead of one.
Hold on... I think this can still work;
* Retain new true 'Includes' bit as old In
(untested)
ap_allow_options() is how applications, including our mod_include, access
the enabled options for a given request (other than evil apps which define
CORE_PRIVATE and locate the core_dir_config). As this is a callable
function, it can map internal, hidden bitmaps as appropriate before
r
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > Backing up a bit...
> >
> > I originally thought we could map bit values in 2.2.x to avoid affecting
> > modules, but that isn't possible since includes-with-exec is two bits
> > instead of one.
>
> Hold on.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> (untested)
These references to OPT_ALL should be OPT_PVT_ALL.
./server/config.c:parms.override_opts = OPT_ALL | OPT_SYM_OWNER |
OPT_MULTI;
./server/config.c:parms.override_opts = OPT_ALL | OPT_SYM_OWNER |
OPT_MULTI;
./server/config
16 matches
Mail list logo
