On 16 Jun 2009, at 23:21, André Malo wrote:
* n...@apache.org wrote:
static void register_hooks(apr_pool_t *p)
{
ap_hook_fixups(fixup_dir,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_LAST);
+ap_hook_fixups(fixup_dflt,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_LAST);
}
module AP_MODULE_DECLARE_DATA dir_module = {
Without furth
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> This might be NotFoundHandler or for dir-not-file, ListingHandler.
Sorry; not ListingHandler, but IndexHandler.
But there is no point to a NotFoundHandler; the existing mechanics
in ScriptAlias combined with PATH_INFO solve that problem already.
I think the inter
>
> + *) mod_dir: add DefaultHandler directive, to enable admin to specify
> + an action to happen when a URL maps to no file, without resorting
> + to ErrorDocument or mod_rewrite. PR 47184 [Nick Kew]
> +
Ixnay on the irectiveday abuseway.
DefaultHandler implies handling all content;
* n...@apache.org wrote:
> static void register_hooks(apr_pool_t *p)
> {
> ap_hook_fixups(fixup_dir,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_LAST);
> +ap_hook_fixups(fixup_dflt,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_LAST);
> }
>
> module AP_MODULE_DECLARE_DATA dir_module = {
Without further checking: should we ensure the fix
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
> Yes should be no problem. Relicensing means I'll also have to remove current
> the current
> version and SVN revisions so there is no problem if someone already
> downloaded the
> GPLed release?
IANAL: I don't see why, they're free to use i
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/16/2009 11:24 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
Hello,
Please note that this program is open source software and was
released under
the GPL.
Regarding the license:
On 06/16/2009 11:24 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
> Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Please note that this program is open source software and was
>>> released under
>>> the GPL.
>>>
>>
>> Regarding the license: That's going to
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
> Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Please note that this program is open source software and was released
>>> under
>>> the GPL.
>>>
>>
>> Regarding the license: That's g
Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
Hello,
Please note that this program is open source software and was released under
the GPL.
Regarding the license: That's going to prevent some interested
parties from clicking through, much less contributin
Hi Rüdiger,
thanks lot ,
I already followed the source code of the mod_cluster. Its uses another
shared memory implementation called slotmem rather than using scorebord.
Are you sure is it possible to change this scorebord lbfactor property
dynamically and it will affect the request distributio
On 06/16/2009 09:20 PM, h iroshan wrote:
> Hi Rüdiger and all,
>
> Actually I want to know ,can't we done it by changing the source code of
> mode proxy balancer.Because properties of the mod_proxy_balancer gets from
> the config. After first time set values for the scoreboard properties by
> c
Hi Rüdiger and all,
Actually I want to know ,can't we done it by changing the source code of
mode proxy balancer.Because properties of the mod_proxy_balancer gets from
the config. After first time set values for the scoreboard properties by
config file , mod_proxy_balancer uses this scoreboard lb
On 06/16/2009 08:43 PM, h iroshan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to know whether the mod_proxy_balancer can dynamically change there
> propertis during the run time. For ex- can we change lbfactor's values for
> workers periodically according to there work load.
>
> If it is ok, is it possible to
Hi All,
I want to know whether the mod_proxy_balancer can dynamically change there
propertis during the run time. For ex- can we change lbfactor's values for
workers periodically according to there work load.
If it is ok, is it possible to do that by updating theworkers lbfactor
values in the sc
Nick Kew writes:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:14:16 -0400
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> IMO potential HTTP violations should remain open until somebody can
>> evaluate them and fix it or explain why the report isn't valid.
>> Thoughts?
>
> +1.
>
> Similar applies (less strongly) to other old bugs that
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote:
> Hello,
> Please note that this program is open source software and was released under
> the GPL.
Regarding the license: That's going to prevent some interested
parties from clicking through, much less contributing to it.
--
Eric Covener
Hello,
there has been an increasing number of requests concerning a certificate
based authentication / authorization for the Apache httpd in the past few
weeks.
As you might remember, I started a discussion around that topic in July
2008.
Because of the somewhat missing interest on the mailing
>> This sounds awesome. Can it act as a forward proxy as well ? I guess
>> we will find out once the source is released.
>
>
> Yes, YTS can be used as a forward proxy.
>
Now that is awesome. I'm very interested now!
On Jun 15, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Pranav Desai wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Roy T. Fielding
wrote:
I think this is an interesting opportunity to compare
different implementations and share code where desirable.
I haven't seen anyone comment on the proposal yet.
Roy
Begin forward
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:14:16 -0400
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> IMO potential HTTP violations should remain open until somebody can
> evaluate them and fix it or explain why the report isn't valid.
> Thoughts?
+1.
Similar applies (less strongly) to other old bugs that haven't been
evaluated just 'cos
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:54 AM, wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16142
>
>
> Dan Poirier changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
>
>
> Status|NEW
On Jun 16, 2009, at 10:02 AM, howard chen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Roy T. Fielding
wrote:
I think this is an interesting opportunity to compare
different implementations and share code where desirable.
I haven't seen anyone comment on the proposal yet.
Just out of curiosity,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Albert Lash wrote:
> > "Apache" is not a committee that decides what should be developed or
> imposes
> > standards like selection of implementation language or other such
> details.
> > The common aspects are instead issues like governing structure,
> licensing,
> "Apache" is not a committee that decides what should be developed or imposes
> standards like selection of implementation language or other such details.
> The common aspects are instead issues like governing structure, licensing,
> and community model. (See http://incubator.apache.org/ and docs
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Albert Lash wrote:
> +1
>
> Speaking of code, I'd be very glad to see more C / C++ in the Apache
> projects. Java is fine but I think Apache went overboard with it a
> little.
"Apache" is not a committee that decides what should be developed or imposes
standards
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> I think this is an interesting opportunity to compare
> different implementations and share code where desirable.
> I haven't seen anyone comment on the proposal yet.
>
Just out of curiosity, Flickr has been a die hard users of Squ
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Albert Lash wrote:
> Speaking of code, I'd be very glad to see more C / C++ in the Apache
> projects. Java is fine but I think Apache went overboard with it a
> little.
+1
+1
Speaking of code, I'd be very glad to see more C / C++ in the Apache
projects. Java is fine but I think Apache went overboard with it a
little.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:19 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>
>> I think this is an interesting opportunity to compare
>> di
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I think this is an interesting opportunity to compare
different implementations and share code where desirable.
I haven't seen anyone comment on the proposal yet.
+1 More code, more fun :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
29 matches
Mail list logo
