On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:21:09PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
> > Vote Results:
> >+1 (binding): Sander Temme, Paul Querna, Joe Orton, Niklas Edmundsson,
> >+1: Gregg Smith
> > +/-0: Rainer Jung
> > -1: William A. Rowe, Jr.
> >
> > Vote passes.
>
> I'm sorry. I
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank wrote:
In the interim, is mod_fastcgi really that bad?
mod_fastcgi is fine for handling GET/POST requests, but it fails to
implement
Autho
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Remember your -deps vote is to approve the release of apr 1.4.0-dev and the
>>> apr-util 1.4.0 dev, and the API versioning rules will bind fro
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> The last I heard, the 'rpm' project is open source, free to be adopted by
> any platform.
Just because rpm is free to be adopted by any platform doesn't mean it
has been. Rpm contains features that allow the spec file to tailor
itself to its build environment, and I a
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> Ok, so they want to roll their own. Sounds like a maintainer issue. What
>> does this say for using our httpd rpm for an Ubuntu or other distribution
>> of linux?
>
> Ubuntu is Debian based, and uses the .de
Tom Evans wrote:
> Really? It works perfectly on all boxes I use it on. What precisely
> has changed about reading a pid from a file, sending signals to a
> process, or spawning a process with specific arguments that has made
> apachectl 'archaic and largely broken', I am intrigued.
And if you ha
On 12/4/09, Barry Scott wrote:
> Eric Covener wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Barry Scott
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In the interim, is mod_fastcgi really that bad?
> > > >
> >
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Tom Evans wrote:
>
>> Really? It works perfectly on all boxes I use it on. What precisely
>> has changed about reading a pid from a file, sending signals to a
>> process, or spawning a process with specific arguments that has made
>> apachec
On 12/4/09, Tom Evans wrote:
> Sorry, what has apachectl got to do with editing files? What has using
> apachectl to stop/start a service got to do with scalability? You've
> completely lost me here.
The only practical thing i can think of is OS vendors providing
separate worker and prefork bin
Eric Covener wrote:
On 12/4/09, Barry Scott wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Barry Scott
wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank
wrote:
In the interim, is mod_fastcgi really
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>> wrote:
>>>
Remember your -deps vote is to approve the release of apr 1.4.0-dev and the
apr-util 1.4.0 dev, and the API
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>
>> As for broken versioning rules, please take that to APR.
>>
>> Perhaps in retrospect, APR would consider an even/odds approach as httpd
>> has for adding (even eliminating) interfaces during a development cycle.
>
> I
Paul Querna wrote:
> Vote Results:
>+1 (binding): Sander Temme, Paul Querna, Joe Orton, Niklas Edmundsson,
>+1: Gregg Smith
> +/-0: Rainer Jung
> -1: William A. Rowe, Jr.
>
> Vote passes.
>
> I'll push out the tarballs to start getting mirrors, and hack on an
> announcement email fo
Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:21:09PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
>> Paul Querna wrote:
>>> Vote Results:
>>>+1 (binding): Sander Temme, Paul Querna, Joe Orton, Niklas Edmundsson,
>>>+1: Gregg Smith
>>> +/-0: Rainer Jung
>>> -1: William A. Rowe, Jr.
>>>
>>> Vote passes.
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Look, PCRE is a mandatory component. APR is a mandatory component.
Let's please start applying some rhyme to our reasoning again.
+1
+1 a good write up.
--
---
15 matches
Mail list logo