On Tuesday 16 February 2010, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Tue Feb 16 21:42:03 2010
New Revision: 910705
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910705view=rev
Log:
support/htcacheclean: Teach it how to write a pid file (modelled on
httpd's writing of a pid file) so that
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 12:17
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tagging 2.2.15 to play openssl catchup?
On 25.02.2010 22:36, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I'd like to move ahead and catch up to OpenSSL 0.9.8m which
was released
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:17:14PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
Isn't 0.9.8m by default still allowing unsafe renegs? So updated
clients will be safe, but the server doesn't enforce the safetyness
(and reject unsafe client).
No, OpenSSL now only allows secure reneg by default, so this is
On 2/26/2010 5:38 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:17:14PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
I guess backporting is pretty straightforward. Wouldn't it be nice
to already support this with 2.2.15?
That was always implicit in the proposal to tag 2.2.15 - catch up with
the API.
As Joe
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:17:14PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
Joe, do you already have a candidate, or should I suggest a backport
patch myself?
Here's the patch:
http://people.apache.org/~jorton/ms_reneg22_v1.diff
I've excluded the docs from that since they don't require RTC, but
obviously
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Tue Feb 9 12:46:17 2010
New Revision: 908015
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=908015view=rev
Log:
* modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c (ssl_cmd_SSLInsecureRenegotiation):
Tweak error wording for when the
On 2/26/2010 10:50 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:17:14PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
Joe, do you already have a candidate, or should I suggest a backport
patch myself?
Here's the patch:
http://people.apache.org/~jorton/ms_reneg22_v1.diff
In the midst of everything, had
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
1) When you use the Protocol directive, which listening ports is it
applied to?
2) Why would you choose to use the Protocol directive, instead of
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Gregg L. Smith li...@glewis.com wrote:
Shouldn't this be a B?
What's one more compiler warning among friends :-)
Fixed/thanks!
wr...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=906612view=rev
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:55:38PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c Tue Feb 9 12:46:17
2010
@@ -637,7 +637,8 @@
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:55:38PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c (original)
+++
Does it build on a properly set up Visual Studio + httpd trunk +
apr-*? I wouldn't know, but if somebody can tell me that it does in a
reasonable manner then I'll commit.
Index: os/win32/BaseAddr.ref
===
--- os/win32/BaseAddr.ref
On 2/26/2010 2:55 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Does it build on a properly set up Visual Studio + httpd trunk +
apr-*? I wouldn't know, but if somebody can tell me that it does in a
reasonable manner then I'll commit.
Go for it :)
13 matches
Mail list logo
