Hi,
here is the second version of my patch to allow per-module loglevel
configuration. It's available at:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/per-module-loglevel-v2/
As it's rather big, I have split it into separate logical patches. I
hope this makes it easier to review:
0001 Add macro wrappers for
On Mar 16, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 3/16/2010 12:37 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
>>>
>>> In some places, we use httpd, but that leads to some horrible
>>> confusion between the product and the command.
>>
>> I gu
On 03/16/2010 09:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I thought the only people who ever capitalize HTTP in httpd are
clueless lawyers.
apache_1.2.4.tar.gz/ABOUT_APACHE
The Apache HTTP Server Project
http://www.apache.org/
June 1997
Seems the HTTPD is used for a long time
I'm sorry,
On 3/16/2010 2:58 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 06:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>
>> I thought the only people who ever capitalize HTTP in httpd are
>> clueless lawyers.
>
> apache_1.2.4.tar.gz/ABOUT_APACHE
>
> The Apache HTTP Server Project
> http://www.apache.org/
> June 1997
On 03/16/2010 06:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I thought the only people who ever capitalize HTTP in httpd are
clueless lawyers.
apache_1.2.4.tar.gz/ABOUT_APACHE
The Apache HTTP Server Project
http://www.apache.org/
June 1997
Seems the HTTPD is used for a long time
Regards
--
^TM
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 15.03.2010 21:46, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Mon Mar 15 20:46:26 2010
New Revision: 923429
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923429&view=rev
Log:
get the socket with ap_get_module_config instead of walking the filter chain
Modifie
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Akins, Brian wrote:
> Is there a particular reason why ProxyPreserveHost is per server
> and not per dir? We have some "unusual" configs and I'm wondering
> what secret internals I may be breaking by changing that? The
> code didn't show anything obvious.
It's per d
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 2:24 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>> On 3/16/2010 12:37 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
In some places, we use httpd, but that leads to some horrible
On 3/16/2010 2:24 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 3/16/2010 12:37 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
>>>
>>> In some places, we use httpd, but that leads to some horrible
>>> confusion between the product and the command.
>>
>> I guess I'm not
Is there a particular reason why ProxyPreserveHost is per server and not
per dir? We have some "unusual" configs and I'm wondering what secret
internals I may be breaking by changing that? The code didn't show anything
obvious.
--
Brian Akins
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 12:37 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
>>
>> In some places, we use httpd, but that leads to some horrible
>> confusion between the product and the command.
>
> I guess I'm not seeing the disconnect. If a reader cannot parse http
On 3/16/2010 12:37 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
>
> In some places, we use httpd, but that leads to some horrible
> confusion between the product and the command.
I guess I'm not seeing the disconnect. If a reader cannot parse httpd
as shorthand "the Apache HTTP Server program", then we have more s
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:48 AM, rbo...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: rbowen
>> Date: Tue Mar 16 12:48:31 2010
>> New Revision: 923712
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923712&view=rev
>> Log:
>> In as much as we can be said to have
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:48 AM, rbo...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rbowen
> Date: Tue Mar 16 12:48:31 2010
> New Revision: 923712
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923712&view=rev
> Log:
> In as much as we can be said to have consensus on anything at all, we
> appear to have consensus that w
Johannes great news, mod_auth_certificate works !
I reckon you need => httpd-2.2.14 in order to use the UID.
See BUG https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45107
Initially I decided to wait for Fedora 13 with httpd-2.2.14
where they say the above BUG is fixed in HTTPD.
In the e
On 15.03.2010 21:46, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: sf
> Date: Mon Mar 15 20:46:26 2010
> New Revision: 923429
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923429&view=rev
> Log:
> get the socket with ap_get_module_config instead of walking the filter chain
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/mo
16 matches
Mail list logo
