On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
How about Apache Web Server? Httpd is just the name of one of the
files, and not even the one people run to start it most of the time.
Apache HTTP Server is fine, but Apache Web Server is equally correct,
easier to
Sorry for delay. Hope I will manage to find some time till monday.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kevac Marko ma...@kevac.org wrote:
If someone is still interested, I can update bug with newer patch in a few
days.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Kevac Marko ma...@kevac.org wrote:
Hello.
On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:48 AM, rbo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rbowen
Date: Tue Mar 16 12:48:31 2010
New Revision: 923712
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923712view=rev
Log:
In as much as we can be said to have consensus on anything
I have signed up for the Apache Retreat in Wicklow (and my employer is
providing me with time off!). I had said that I would work on the
Apache HTTPD documentation once I had finished writing The Apache2
Pocket Reference, but work and real life intervened. I would be
interested to know
On Mar 17, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Andrew Ford wrote:
I have signed up for the Apache Retreat in Wicklow (and my employer
is providing me with time off!). I had said that I would work on
the Apache HTTPD documentation once I had finished writing The
Apache2 Pocket Reference, but work and real
On 3/17/2010 2:06 PM, Andrew Ford wrote:
I have signed up for the Apache Retreat in Wicklow (and my employer is
providing me with time off!). I had said that I would work on the
Apache HTTPD documentation once I had finished writing The Apache2
Pocket Reference, but work and real life
