Re: Module development - server config vs directory config

Thank you for the redirect on modules dev... I saw apache dev and jumped. I can post code tomorrow...but when I call the get_config, I am passing r->server->xxxconfig (can't remember off the top of my head). Either way, I will double check the pointer. Thank you! Brian sent from my G1 Android p

Re: Module development - server config vs directory config

On 17 Jun 2010, at 05:02, Brian Locke wrote: > Howdy all.. > I'm a new module developer, so be gentle please. modules-dev might have been a better list to post to. You're accessing per-dir config when you're looking for server config. There's a very brief (and old) intro at http://www.apachet

Module development - server config vs directory config

Howdy all.. I'm a new module developer, so be gentle please. I have written a simple module for Apache 2.0. If I have a create server config without a create dir config as well, I get a fault from the server when it loads the module. The error appears in ap_walk_config_sub in config.c. The call to

Re: mod_authn_cache

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > I thought we had a mod_authn_cache, but it seems it only exists in the > old 2.1 authn stuff at sourceforge! > > Just thinking about hacking this up, and wondering how best to do it. > Basic shape seems straightforward enough: > > 1.  Make it a pr

Re: mod_authn_cache

On 17 Jun 2010, at 12:29 AM, Nick Kew wrote: But how to implement the cache itself is less clear. The simplest solution would be to hijack mod_authn_dbm and add a cacheing function and configuration. But the new socache framework presents an alternative, and an option for users of threade

mod_authn_cache

I thought we had a mod_authn_cache, but it seems it only exists in the old 2.1 authn stuff at sourceforge! Just thinking about hacking this up, and wondering how best to do it. Basic shape seems straightforward enough: 1. Make it a provider like the standard mod_authn_ 2. Configure it ahead

Re: svn commit: r952443 - /httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:16:11PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 07.06.2010 23:16, jor...@apache.org wrote: > >--- httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t (original) > >+++ httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t Mon Jun 7 21:16:50 2010 > >@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use Apache::Test; > > use Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

+1: Non-binding and missed the deadline, but for what it's worth... Downloads okay, md5 & sha checksums good. Built on Mac OS 10.6.3 with CC='gcc -arch i386' Test framework passes except for SSL, I think I would need to track down a more recent OpenSSL than Mac OS 10.6.3 provides to get the sessio

Re: svn commit: r952443 - /httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t

Hi Joe, On 07.06.2010 23:16, jor...@apache.org wrote: Author: jorton Date: Mon Jun 7 21:16:50 2010 New Revision: 952443 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952443&view=rev Log: - make more robust against failure cases Modified: httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t Modified: h

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: C'mon... any other votes? :) >>> >>> I'm working on it, but so f

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> C'mon... any other votes? :) >> >> I'm working on it, but so far I can't get the two tarballs to build on >> Solaris 10 with "

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available > at: > >   > > Your votes please; > > +/- 1 [+1]  Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

On 11.06.2010 18:46, Jim Jagielski wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available at: Your votes please; +/- 1 [ X] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha I built it on Solaris 8, Solaris 10 (both Sparc, using gcc), SuSE Linux Enterpr

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

+1 to release as alpha. AIX 6.1/32-bit/xlc passes test framework. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

Jim Jagielski wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available at: Your votes please; +/- 1 [ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010. I think I'm just squeaking in under the deadl

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> C'mon... any other votes? :) > > I'm working on it, but so far I can't get the two tarballs to build on > Solaris 10 with "./configure --prefix=FOO", apparently due to some > libtool vers

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

On 16.06.2010 14:31, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: C'mon... any other votes? :) I'm working on it... Me to. Running the test framework right now ...

Re: C as config

On 16 Jun 2010, at 12:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote: The core output filter should coalesce "small" writes already and if it's not doing that effeciently that's a bug. Are the "tiny" files you were seeing getting sendfile()d out bigger than AP_MIN_SENDFILE_BYTES? That sounds like a case for bumping

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > C'mon... any other votes? :) I'm working on it, but so far I can't get the two tarballs to build on Solaris 10 with "./configure --prefix=FOO", apparently due to some libtool version issue down in expat (running buildconf just moved libtool

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha

C'mon... any other votes? :) On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available > at: > > > > Your votes please; > > +/- 1 > [ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha > > Vote closes at 15:00 UT

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

On 16.06.2010 04:27, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 6/15/2010 7:27 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, Am 16.06.2010 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Netware ===conf default proposed StartThreads250 50 50 MinSpareThreads 25 10 25 MaxSpareTh

Re: C as config

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:05:21PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 16 Jun 2010, at 10:45 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > > >>There is already mod_buffer in trunk. From reading the docs, it > >>should > >>be suitable for this purpose. Or is it missing some functionality? > > > >You can get many of the ben

Re: C as config

On 16 Jun 2010, at 10:45 AM, Joe Orton wrote: There is already mod_buffer in trunk. From reading the docs, it should be suitable for this purpose. Or is it missing some functionality? You can get many of the benefits of using a memory buffer in the output filter chain very cheaply by incr

Re: C as config

On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Brian Pane wrote: > > As long as the documentation explained to users that they need to > > have enough memory to accommodate MaxClient * > > MaxOutputBufferedPerRequest (where the latter is a hypothetical > >