On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Brian Pane wrote: > > As long as the documentation explained to users that they need to > > have enough memory to accommodate MaxClient * > > MaxOutputBufferedPerRequest (where the latter is a hypothetical > > name for a configurable limit on the amount of buffered output), > > such a feature would be a net win for lots of sites. > > There is already mod_buffer in trunk. From reading the docs, it should > be suitable for this purpose. Or is it missing some functionality?
You can get many of the benefits of using a memory buffer in the output filter chain very cheaply by increasing SendBufferSize, without the extra overhead of an extra filter. > As an added feature, one could imagine dumping very large responses > into a tempfile. But not that, of course... Regards, Joe
