On 10/5/2010 2:31 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> ... this addition seems to be unrelated to the change.
Playing with too many patches in tree, thanks Rainer :)
On 10/5/2010 5:41 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> All;
>With the talk about a 2.2.17 coming soon, I would very much like to get
> the remaining
> requisite votes and implementation of the patch (48939 - in STATUS currently)
> I had
> submitted for inclusion. I know a lot of folks are rather busy
Hello!!
I would like to know how apache schedule their threads? for example: how the
workers are scheduled??
thaks a lot
--
Paulo Sérgio Franco Eustáquio.
Msc Candidate at ICMC/USP
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6072368277185653
All;
With the talk about a 2.2.17 coming soon, I would very much like to
get the remaining requisite votes and implementation of the patch (48939
- in STATUS currently) I had submitted for inclusion. I know a lot of
folks are rather busy these days, but I was hoping I could draw
attention
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 12:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> I'd like to spend the next two weeks or so looking for the low hanging
>> fruit, and tag 2.0.64 as something close to a final tarball in very
>> early October so it's truly out of sigh
On Monday 04 October 2010, Igor Galić wrote:
> one of the (seemingly) useful symmetries missing from
> LogFormat in ErrorLogFormat is %v
>
> Without having looked at the code yet: How difficult is it to
> implement?
Not difficult at all.
> But more importantly: How useful do you think it is?
I
On Tuesday 05 October 2010, Chris Darroch wrote:
>I stared at the definition of crypt_data in crypt.h, poked
> around at various things, then gave up and went for quick bike
> ride. The answer immediately popped to mind: I'd set my
> ThreadStackSize really low, to 64 KB, and while that usually
Hi Bill,
On 05.10.2010 19:49, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Oct 5 17:49:41 2010
New Revision: 1004734
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004734&view=rev
Log:
This really didn't need a backport vote per say, is already built
for other platforms, and for Windows in trunk.
On 9/24/2010 12:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> I'd like to spend the next two weeks or so looking for the low hanging
> fruit, and tag 2.0.64 as something close to a final tarball in very
> early October so it's truly out of sight, out of mind by ApacheCon.
> Of course I'd love help - does 2 w
