On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:13 AM, wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Wed Jun 8 22:13:21 2011
> New Revision: 1133582
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1133582&view=rev
> Log:
> mod_data: Introduce a filter to support RFC2397 data URLs.
Why is this in the core?
The example in the documenta
On 6/13/2011 6:11 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:13 AM, wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Wed Jun 8 22:13:21 2011
>> New Revision: 1133582
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1133582&view=rev
>> Log:
>> mod_data: Introduce a filter to support RFC2397 data URLs.
>
>
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>
> Why is this in the core?
>
> The example in the documentation doesn't make sense, this data encoded
> this way is inline, not the whole response.
>
> I don't get why this is a filter in httpd core, its a feature of an
> app server when its g
Hi,
Drs. Jeffrey Carver, Rosanna Guadagno, Debra McCallum, and Mr. Amiangshu
Bosu, University of Alabama, and Dr. Lorin Hochstein, University of
Southern California, are conducting a survey of open-source software
developers. This survey seeks to understand how developers on distributed,
virtual
On 13 Jun 2011, at 1:11 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Why is this in the core?
The example in the documentation doesn't make sense, this data encoded
this way is inline, not the whole response.
This was covered in the original thread, which contains links
explaining what rfc2397 is and what it doe
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Joachim Zobel wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Will the mod_lua filter hook be implemented in the near future? I am
> aware that this requires wrapping buckets and brigades, which is a lot
> of work. Are there any plans for generated API wrappers as mod_perl has
> them?
I'd very m
Hi Jeff,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> has anyone played with this before? I've seen it mentioned, and
> joe s had a patch to create a linger thread for worker back in
> 2004
>
> the attached patch hasn't been seriously tested (or even seriously
> coded)
>
> if somebody has lo
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Tuesday 26 April 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> has anyone played with this before? I've seen it mentioned, and
>> joe s had a patch to create a linger thread for worker back in
>> 2004
>>
>> the attached patch hasn't been ser
Yeah my patch was based on worker, not event. Not sure
what I wrote any more, but it was likely my first crack
at thread programming, so it probably needed work.
- Original Message
> From: Jeff Trawick
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 3:09:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [PA
On Monday 13 June 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > I have looked at limiting the maximum connections per-process for
> > event (see STATUS) and think that would be easier to implement if
> > the lingering close would be done by the listener thread. Two
> > questions:
> >
> > Did you have a chance to
On Thursday 09 June 2011, Igor Galić wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > On June 8, 2011 20:11 , Igor =?utf-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?=
> >
> > wrote:
> > > One of the many good suggestions they propose is to have a
> > > "Patch Manager" - someone who makes sure that patches
> > > submitted via Bug
On Thursday 09 June 2011, Igor Galić wrote:
> I've watched this talk three or four times by now, and every time
> motivates me to look into our bug tracker. The overwhelming number
> of (currently) 1133 open issues, however soon dampens my
> enthusiasm.
>
> http://s.apache.org/a2open
> http://s.ap
12 matches
Mail list logo
