On 7/5/2011 4:21 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> Here is what gets built for most (M) and all (A) and what I would like
> to change. The choices are certainly subjective, but I think there
> should be many changes where we all agree. So please comment.
On 7/5/2011 4:21 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Here is what gets built for most (M) and all (A) and what I would like
> to change. The choices are certainly subjective, but I think there
> should be many changes where we all agree. So please comment.
+1 to all of your suggestions, though I wonder a
Am 06.07.2011 01:18, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Hi Bill,
can you please tell me how it is intended to make mod_authnz_ldap.c
aware of AP_HAS_LDAP ?
I see you added ap_ldap.h[w|nw] which should define it, but for NetWare
mod_authnz_ldap.c still bails out:
CC mod_authnz_ldap.c
### mwccnlm Compiler:
# F
Hi Bill,
can you please tell me how it is intended to make mod_authnz_ldap.c
aware of AP_HAS_LDAP ?
I see you added ap_ldap.h[w|nw] which should define it, but for NetWare
mod_authnz_ldap.c still bails out:
CC mod_authnz_ldap.c
### mwccnlm Compiler:
#File: mod_authnz_ldap.c
#
Very positive here is that it uses lot less memory.
See attached pic of www.apachelounge.com/, the light blue solid is httpd.
You can see it drops half.
It stopped using 2.3.13, mainly because the SSL and rewrite proxy issues.
Steffen
<>
On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Igor Galić wrote:
> even though it means that "reallyall" will yield different
> results on different systems
That was the point of "reallyall". Build everything that is possible
with the installed dependencies. It wouldn't be very useful if you
would need all kinds of w
Was always working fine with 2.2.19, but with 2.3.13 I get:
I call https://www.sjorsland.com/surgeweb/ :
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /surgeweb/.
Reason: DNS lookup failure for: www.sjorsland.
Better, it loads.
But I am dealing with the rewrite issues, see my next post
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe Jr."
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Windows 2.3.13 :: SSL issues AcceptFilter https none
On 7/5/2011 2:34 PM, Steffen wrote:
With Accept
On Thursday 30 June 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2011, at 8:29 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >> This is fixed by calling the ldap_get_option() function
> >> described in section 9.2 of
> >> http://www-archive.mozilla.org/directory/ietf-docs/draft-ietf-ld
> >> ap ext-ldap-c-api-05.txt . The
On 7/5/2011 2:34 PM, Steffen wrote:
> With AcceptFilter https none HTTPS is broken.
And with AcceptFilter https data ?
With AcceptFilter https none HTTPS is broken.
Using the common used config for several vhosts:
DocumentRoot "f:/web/land10nl"
ServerName www.land10web.com:443
errorLog f:/log/apache/serror.log
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule /(.*) http://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [P,L]
...
...
e.g. Chrome says:
Fout 107 (n
I've decided to revoke the vote for 2.3.13...
I plan on doing a T&R of 2.3.14 later on this week.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.13 are now available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm opening up a vote to release these a
On 4 Jul 2011, at 21:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
> When testing 2.3.13 I built mod_privileges. I notices that I couldn't
> load it if the process was run by a non root user.
>
> Platform was Solaris 10, and the problem was, that the module wants to
> add proc_setid to PRIV_PERMITTED. Of course the mo
On 7/5/2011 2:46 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> IMO it is much better to leave this stuff in the control of people who
> build the software, who can already set env vars or LDFLAGS as they
> require. (It would also be much better if everybody used libtool, since
> as you say, the .la files make this pr
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> > I will think about a good way, how users can pass additional LDADD
> > flags. Putting the "-R ..." into the LDFLAGS seems to be too heavy,
> > because then the RPATH of every module etc. will contain the given
> > directory. The real
> I will think about a good way, how users can pass additional LDADD
> flags. Putting the "-R ..." into the LDFLAGS seems to be too heavy,
> because then the RPATH of every module etc. will contain the given
> directory. The real problematic cases are only mod_lua and in rare
> circumstances (you w
- Original Message -
> Good morning Igor :)
And a beautiful good morning to you too (:
> On 05.07.2011 03:09, Igor Galić wrote:
> >
> > When trying to compile httpd with --enable-mods-shared=reallyall
> > configure will currently abort on my system because it doesn't
> > find distcache
Hi Joe,
On 05.07.2011 09:46, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> a couple of modules have additional external dependencies:
>>
>> mod_deflate: zlib
>> mod_lua: lua
>> mod_serf: serf
>> mod_socache_dc: distcache
>>
>> At the moment,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> a couple of modules have additional external dependencies:
>
> mod_deflate: zlib
> mod_lua: lua
> mod_serf: serf
> mod_socache_dc: distcache
>
> At the moment, the compiled modules do not contain any RPATH/RUNPATH
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
