Thanks for the reminder. I was about to send one myself to see if there was a
chosen path.
\|/- Keith Mashinter
kmash...@yahoo.com
From: Daniel Ruggeri
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2011 6:55:04 PM
Subject: Re: id=51247 Enhance mod_proxy
On 5/25/2011 7:49 AM, Keith Mashinter wrote:
> I've reviewed the other
> patch https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841 and I
> had a similar idea, wondering if the route-only intent would happen if
> I tried to set lbfactor=0 but it only allowed values 1-100 and I
> worried about t
On 8/5/2011 2:57 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2011, Kaspar Brand wrote:
>> On 03.08.2011 19:08, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> My thought, it probably should be a set of commits;
>>>
>>> * Drop SSLC (first patch)
>>> * Drop OpenSSL < 0.9.7 (second patch)
>>> * Drop ssl_toolkit
On 8/1/2011 11:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The tarballs for httpd-2.3.14 are available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please VOTE on whether to release these as Apache httpd-2.3.14,
> beta.
+1
+1: OSX 10.6, 10.7
+1: Fed 14
+1: Ubuntu 10.04
On Aug 1, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The tarballs for httpd-2.3.14 are available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please VOTE on whether to release these as Apache httpd-2.3.14,
> beta.
>
On Friday 05 August 2011, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> On 03.08.2011 19:08, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> > My thought, it probably should be a set of commits;
> >
> > * Drop SSLC (first patch)
> > * Drop OpenSSL < 0.9.7 (second patch)
> > * Drop ssl_toolkit_compat wrapper (third patch)
> > * Warn on
