sorry for my noise.
just cleaned up my build tree and tried from the beginning. no more compile
errors.
thx for your help
Stefan
Hi Bill,
On 02.10.2011 09:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 9/29/2011 9:31 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> In light of the TLS 1.0 CBC attack (aka BEAST, CVE-2011-3389) I suggest
>> we update our SSL configuration analogous to what's in trunk.
>>
>> - Choose a better default SSLCipherSuite
>> - Add SS
On 06.10.2011 10:58, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On 02.10.2011 09:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 9/29/2011 9:31 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> In light of the TLS 1.0 CBC attack (aka BEAST, CVE-2011-3389) I suggest
>>> we update our SSL configuration analogous to what's in trunk.
>>>
>>> -
Would like to T&R this week… we have 2 showstoppers awaiting
just 1 vote each to be backport-able.
On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> On 10/5/2011 4:18 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> True. But a generic apparatus for even more fine-grained log
>> configuration won't happen in time for 2.4.
>
> I have toyed with the idea of this... do you have suggestions on how
> this might be
On 10/6/2011 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Would like to T&R this week… we have 2 showstoppers awaiting
> just 1 vote each to be backport-able.
And a third bug report at security@ (vulnerability is dubious, but it's
still a bug ;-)
Hi Dev,
I'm working on a caching protocol similar to HTTP on a different research. I
have the following question regarding the e-tags.
When does exactly apache computes the e-tag for a certain resource?
Does it compute that when there is a request for that particular resource or
is it computed by
On Oct 6, 2011, at 12:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 10/6/2011 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Would like to T&R this week… we have 2 showstoppers awaiting
>> just 1 vote each to be backport-able.
>
> And a third bug report at security@ (vulnerability is dubious, but it's
> still a bug
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Wed Oct 5 21:25:58 2011
New Revision: 1179448
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1179448&view=rev
Log:
Export ap_max_mem_free, needed by r1178079, as pointed out by Gregg L. Smith
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h
htt
Am 06.10.2011 19:03, schrieb Amila Liyanaarachchi:
> Hi Dev,
>
> I'm working on a caching protocol similar to HTTP on a different research. I
> have the following question regarding
> the e-tags.
> When does exactly apache computes the e-tag for a certain resource?
> Does it compute that when th
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 10/5/2011 4:18 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
True. But a generic apparatus for even more fine-grained log
configuration won't happen in time for 2.4.
I have toyed with the idea of this... do you have su
I've been giving this a bunch of thought, not to 'tune' the messages,
but simply localize them. The tuning of messages would be a snap.
My thought is to build two reference tables, the first of replacement
messages hashed by source messages, and the second of replacement
messages hashed by source
On 10/6/2011 1:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
> On startup, read an arbitrary localization file of source:replacement
> error strings (corresponding to the strings scattered throughout our
> sources). These obviously include any subst tokens, so the file
> permissions of such a localization
On 10/6/2011 12:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 2011, at 12:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> On 10/6/2011 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Would like to T&R this week… we have 2 showstoppers awaiting
>>> just 1 vote each to be backport-able.
>>
>> And a third bug report at securi
Greetings,
Any update to CVE-2011-3192 in 2.0?
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=131548758430087
regards,
Ryan
On 10/6/2011 2:47 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Any update to CVE-2011-3192 in 2.0?
> http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=131548758430087
--
> Is there a release schedule?
no
I believe this patch, introducing SetEnvIf OID evaluation...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=220307
is rendered redundant, or at least should be redundant if the
ap_expr engine can be made capable... by...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1037137
Thought
On 06.10.2011 10:58, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 02.10.2011 09:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> -1 in this respect; faster is not more secure. We must default to setting
>> the strictest cipher choices, with a commented-out "this is faster, but far
>> less secure" alternative for those with less targ
On 10/7/2011 12:05 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> On 06.10.2011 10:58, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 02.10.2011 09:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> -1 in this respect; faster is not more secure. We must default to setting
>>> the strictest cipher choices, with a commented-out "this is faster, but far
>>>
19 matches
Mail list logo
