Room for improvement? Forwarding as attach to include formatting.
Thanks for the observations, Tianyin!
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, Martin,
Thanks a lot! I found the root cause after diving into code.
The error is caused by my wrong settings. I try to create a too big
scoreboard file (which is ev
Am 21.03.2012 19:45, schrieb Michael Felt:
Unfortunately - 2.4.2 is a nogo...
Same compiler warning messages, install and then ...
Installation Summary
NameLevel PartEvent Result
---
On 21 Mar 2012, at 21:46, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> But one thing that would be very interesting in this case, namely the
> X-Forwarded-For header, is something that most admins of a reverse-proxied
> site do NOT want to disclose at the end-point. They may also not want to
> reveal other headers
On Wednesday 21 March 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/21/2012 2:59 PM, Mark Montague wrote:
> > On March 21, 2012 15:33 , "Roy T. Fielding"
wrote:
> >> TRACE won't work at all if the most popular end-point doesn't
> >> support it.
> >
> > Why would this be a bad thing? Or, to phrase it
Playing with the --with-module=foo:foo feature Jim introduced last year,
I note that it can almost entirely build mod_foo.c into the server with no
supporting build files, except that Makefile.in is required.
The minimal contents of Makefile.in consists of
include $(top_srcdir)/build/special
On 3/21/2012 2:59 PM, Mark Montague wrote:
> On March 21, 2012 15:33 , "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
>> TRACE won't work at all if the most popular end-point doesn't support it.
>
> Why would this be a bad thing? Or, to phrase it another way, what are the
> situations in
> which it is desirable tha
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 21.03.2012 21:02, schrieb Greg Stein:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 15:59, Mark Montague wrote:
>>> On March 21, 2012 15:33 , "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
TRACE won't work at all if the most popular end-point doesn't support it.
>>>
>>>
Am 21.03.2012 21:02, schrieb Greg Stein:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 15:59, Mark Montague wrote:
>> On March 21, 2012 15:33 , "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
>>>
>>> TRACE won't work at all if the most popular end-point doesn't support it.
>>
>> Why would this be a bad thing? Or, to phrase it another w
On March 21, 2012 16:02 , Greg Stein wrote:
TRACE won't work at all if the most popular end-point doesn't support it.
Why would this be a bad thing? Or, to phrase it another way, what are the
situations in which it is desirable that TRACE be already-enabled on a web
server as opposed to having
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 15:59, Mark Montague wrote:
> On March 21, 2012 15:33 , "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
>>
>> TRACE won't work at all if the most popular end-point doesn't support it.
>
> Why would this be a bad thing? Or, to phrase it another way, what are the
> situations in which it is desir
On March 21, 2012 15:33 , "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
TRACE won't work at all if the most popular end-point doesn't support it.
Why would this be a bad thing? Or, to phrase it another way, what are
the situations in which it is desirable that TRACE be already-enabled on
a web server as opposed
On Mar 21, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 17 March 2012, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
We still enable TRACE by default.
Is this useful enough to justify making every other poor sap with
a secur
Unfortunately - 2.4.2 is a nogo...
Same compiler warning messages, install and then ...
Installation Summary
NameLevel PartEvent Result
---
ASF.httpd.rt
root@x103:[/data/prj/httpd-trunk]build/aix/buildaix.ksh
+ ./configure
--enable-layout=AIX
--with-apr=/opt/bin/apr-1-config
--with-apr-util=/opt/bin/apu-1-config
--enable-mpms-shared=all
--enable-mods-shared=all
> @@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ AP_DECLARE(apr_status_t) ap_fatal_signal
>
> #endif /* NO_USE_SIGACTION */
>
> - pconf = in_pconf;
> + pconf = pconf;
> parent_pid = my_pid = getpid();
Doesn't the parameter name need to be changed back?
root@x103:[/data/prj/httpd-trunk]mv ../apr ../aprx
root@x103:[/data/prj/httpd-trunk]./buildconf
You don't have a copy of the apr source in srclib/apr.
Please get the source using the following instructions,
or specify the location of the source with
--with-apr=[path to apr] :
svn co http://svn
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
> Gün,
>
> It Works!
>
>
> On 3/20/2012 4:18 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>
>>
>> Gregg, can you please run a Windows build?
>>
>> Gün.
>>
>
> tried to build from fresh apr, apr-util and httpd-trunk
could not run buildconf for apr because I do not
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:48 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Nessus, despite I do like it, and as it is a respected industry standard,
> > has its fair share of false positives,
> > for simple example, look at FTP, running a public FTP server you get a
> > severity "medium" warning, I mean like.
Am 21.03.2012 14:41, schrieb Noel Butler:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 13:55 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
> Firstly, as stated previously, I agree TRACE should be disabled by default
> because those that need it are probably
> at about 1 in 1, and I'd like to see a proper vote called on it :)
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 13:55 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
Firstly, as stated previously, I agree TRACE should be disabled by
default because those that need it are probably at about 1 in 1, and
I'd like to see a proper vote called on it :) however...
>
> fact is that nessus-scans usually
Am 21.03.2012 13:48, schrieb Tim Bannister:
> On 21 Mar 2012, at 12:39, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> 1 out of a million servers needs TRACE enabled
>>
>> it was ALWAYS a good idea to disable ANYTHING by default what is not really
>> needed and this principle will stay
>
> inetd normally ships wit
On 21 Mar 2012, at 12:39, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 1 out of a million servers needs TRACE enabled
>
> it was ALWAYS a good idea to disable ANYTHING by default what is not really
> needed and this principle will stay
inetd normally ships with echo not running, but kernels usually ship with ICMP
e
Am 17.03.2012 10:24, schrieb Roy T. Fielding:
> On Mar 16, 2012, at 7:18 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> We still enable TRACE by default.
>>
>> Is this useful enough to justify making every other poor sap with a
>> security scanner have to manually turn it off?
>
> Yes.
>
>> I'm hoping 2.4.x is
On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Saturday 17 March 2012, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>> We still enable TRACE by default.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this useful enough to justify making every other poor sap with
>>> a security scanner have to manually turn it off?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
24 matches
Mail list logo
