The discussion is moot. The ASF will not provide binary software.
nd
Yeah, try selling that to the AOO project and see what happens...
Issac
On 11/28/2012 7:20 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
There is far far far more httpd users on other operating systems than
windows, what next, do binaries for all maintained RH, Suse, Gentoo,
BSD, debian.. and so on as well... I mean surely nobody wants
to be seen as catering for the minority
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 12:27 +, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 13:22
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Volunteers to drive an MSI build
> >
> >
> > On No
* Gregg Smith wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 8:10 AM, André Malo wrote:
> > Some individuals have provided those builds. Nobody has voted on them
> > (because, how could one - I know, I wouldn't). They are not official
> > relases.
>
> Which to the average user that does not know this policy, can easily b
On 11/28/2012 8:10 AM, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 17:02:30 Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM, André Malo wrote:
You know that, and I know that. Jst as our Windows users know
they have no use for source code.
The discussion is moot. The ASF will not provi
On 11/28/2012 1:26 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
I believe there's a couple of things we all sort of agree on:
* current state is not welcomed by users and "early" adopters
I'm not sure what you mean by current state. Regardless, early adopters
know no better.
* we (the ASF) should provide an officia
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 17:02:30 Yehuda Katz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM, André Malo wrote:
> > > You know that, and I know that. Jst as our Windows users know
> > > they have no use for source code.
> >
> > The discussion is moot. The ASF will not provide binary software.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM, André Malo wrote:
> > You know that, and I know that. Jst as our Windows users know
> > they have no use for source code.
>
> The discussion is moot. The ASF will not provide binary software.
>
Is that a new policy? ASF has provided (i.e. made available on
httpd
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 15:01:15 Igor Galić wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> > > Sent: Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 13:22
> > > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Volunteers to drive an MSI b
A Windows binary build is important to do for both influencing the Windows
users and the code design quality of Apache itself, unless you all hate to care
about both;)
Regards,
Bing
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:2
- Original Message -
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 13:22
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Volunteers to drive an MSI build
> >
> >
> > On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:26 AM, Igor Galić
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 13:22
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Volunteers to drive an MSI build
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:26 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
> >
> > * we (the ASF) should provide an offici
On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:26 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> * we (the ASF) should provide an official Windows Build
>
Why?
- Original Message -
> > the only point to resolve is that Gregg cant do the releases self
> > but needs
> > a PMC for signing and putting up the artifacts - but I'm willing to
> > assist
> > with that once we get some agreement to put his stuff up
>
> Sorry for not commenting earlier .
14 matches
Mail list logo