Re: 2.4.3, build with vc11 (2012)

2013-01-26 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote: hi! Has anyone tried to build 2.4.3 with vc11? Using either makefiles or dsp (converted), I got a rc.exe error, invalid usage. The cmd line is: rc.exe /d NDEBUG /d APP_FILE /d BIN_NAME=httpd.exe /d

Re: 2.4.3, build with vc11 (2012)

2013-01-26 Thread Mario Brandt
Hi, Alternatively porting the php build script (autoconf-like system, implemented in javascript, using cscript), it is very flexible and allows exact match to what is done using the unix autoconf configure options. I'm for it. An automatic build script no matter the language would be awesome.

Re: 2.4.3, build with vc11 (2012)

2013-01-26 Thread Pierre Joye
Hi Mario! On Jan 26, 2013 5:24 PM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Alternatively porting the php build script (autoconf-like system, implemented in javascript, using cscript), it is very flexible and allows exact match to what is done using the unix autoconf configure options.

Re: [Vote] Overhaul modules.apache.org

2013-01-26 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Friday 25 January 2013, Daniel Gruno wrote: [ ] +1: I support this proposal [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because... +1

Re: [Vote] Overhaul modules.apache.org

2013-01-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 25.01.2013 14:21, Daniel Gruno wrote: Vote [XX] +1: I support this proposal [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because... +1 Thanks! Rainer

Re: [Vote] Overhaul modules.apache.org

2013-01-26 Thread Eric Covener
[ ] +1: I support this proposal [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because... +1

Re: [Vote] Overhaul modules.apache.org

2013-01-26 Thread Roy T. Fielding
+1 Roy

Re: svn commit: r1439000 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref

2013-01-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 27.01.2013 01:08, gsm...@apache.org wrote: Author: gsmith Date: Sun Jan 27 00:08:04 2013 New Revision: 1439000 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1439000view=rev Log: mod_lua image size has surpassed 0x0001, step it up a notch Modified:

Re: svn commit: r1439000 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref

2013-01-26 Thread Gregg Smith
On 1/26/2013 8:04 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Doesn't that mean the address needs to be 0x6F85 to provide ample space before the mod_sed.so address? And then all addresses below mod_lua need to be lowered by 0x1 as well? Yes, thanks for the catch. Fixed in r1439027. Regards, Gregg