Re: mod_proxy_websocket/tunnel

2013-03-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
From my somewhat limited testing, so far things look good... Who can provide some more rigorous tests?

Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Gruno
Hi folks, I've just proposed a rather large backport of all the Lua stuff we have in trunk, I hope you'll take a look at it. Basically, this is a sync between trunk and 2.4, which will bring the LuaCodeCache, the LuaScope server [min [max], Lua input/output filters, LuaMapHandler as well as the

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 08.03.2013 17:32, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I've just proposed a rather large backport of all the Lua stuff we have in trunk, I hope you'll take a look at it. to me it seems to make more sense to just copy over the trunk version to 2.4 branch ... Gün.

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 03/08/2013 07:12 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 08.03.2013 17:32, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I've just proposed a rather large backport of all the Lua stuff we have in trunk, I hope you'll take a look at it. to me it seems to make more sense to just copy over the trunk version to 2.4 branch ...

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 08.03.2013 19:15, schrieb Daniel Gruno: On 03/08/2013 07:12 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 08.03.2013 17:32, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I've just proposed a rather large backport of all the Lua stuff we have in trunk, I hope you'll take a look at it. to me it seems to make more sense to just copy

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
From what I can see, that's exactly what it does... I plan on testing this weekend. Daniel, do you have any testing suites you use? On Mar 8, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: Am 08.03.2013 17:32, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I've just proposed a rather large backport of all

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 03/08/2013 08:22 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: From what I can see, that's exactly what it does... I plan on testing this weekend. Daniel, do you have any testing suites you use? I have some additions to the Perl framework we use, but that's mostly for testing the LuaMapHandler (which no one

Re: mod_proxy_websocket/tunnel

2013-03-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.03.2013 13:40, Jim Jagielski wrote: From my somewhat limited testing, so far things look good... Who can provide some more rigorous tests? I never used them myself, but http://autobahn.ws/ provides a broadly used test suite. Mark T. uses it for his development of Websockets for Tomcat.

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 03/08/2013 08:22 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: From what I can see, that's exactly what it does... I plan on testing this weekend. Daniel, do you have any testing suites you use? I have some additions to the Perl framework we use, but that's mostly for

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 03/08/2013 08:22 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: From what I can see, that's exactly what it does... I plan on testing this weekend. Daniel, do you have any testing suites you use? Okay, I'm being told I should stop being on Portland time and get back to my usual day rhythm, so I'll cut the

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Gregg Smith (gsmith)
On 3/8/2013 11:49 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: for testing the LuaMapHandler (which no one uses*cough*). I tried a week or two ago after finding an example using it, then quickly found out it had disappeared thanks to a commit logged remove some debug logging which snuck in, which snuck out a lot

Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 03/08/2013 11:18 PM, Gregg Smith (gsmith) wrote: On 3/8/2013 11:49 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: for testing the LuaMapHandler (which no one uses*cough*). I tried a week or two ago after finding an example using it, then quickly found out it had disappeared thanks to a commit logged remove

Re: SSLProxyCheckPeerCN / ProxyPreserveHost issue

2013-03-08 Thread Lam, Eugene
Hi folks, I came across an old issue that was discussed previously under SSLProxyCheckPeerCN / ProxyPreserveHost issue: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201209.mbox/%3c50462600.7010...@kippdata.de%3E However, I think I have found a legitimate use-case where I do want Apache to