Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ ] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2)
TIA!
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ ] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
TIA!
On 28.06.2013 19:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
>
> [ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
> [X] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
Rainer
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
>
> [ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
> [ ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
>
>
[X] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is mo
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
>
> [ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
> [ X ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
>
>
Regards
Rüdiger
Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
[ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
[ ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
On Jun 28, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 28.06.2013 03:59, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> On 28.06.2013 01:03, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel and/or Günter,
>>>
>>> can you have a look at the trunk CHANGES file and move the lua items
>>> that should now be in 2.4 to the 2.4 CHANGES file?
On 28/06/2013 10:31, Rob Stradling wrote:
> How about making ECDH parameters configurable from within Apache too?
>
The current technique of hard coding the ECDH parameters isn't correct but it's
the best release versions of OpenSSL can do.
The unreleased OpenSSL 1.0.2 can be configured to use t
It could be done, yes.
However, it's slightly less necessary, as right now prime256v1 curve
is the default one, and it's a secure one (until Dan Bernstein
publishes his paper about NIST curves).
On high-volume websites, some may be tempted to switch to prime224v1
if it was possible; it's twice as f
How about making ECDH parameters configurable from within Apache too?
On 28/06/13 09:57, MikeM wrote:
Hi,
I agree that the configuration of DH parameters should be possible from
within Apache. Ideally the configuration should allow the size of random
DH Parameters to be chosen and also allow th
Hi,
I agree that the configuration of DH parameters should be possible from
within Apache. Ideally the configuration should allow the size of random
DH Parameters to be chosen and also allow the user to provide a
preconfigured DH Parameter file.
This patch should be included into 2.2 and 2.4
Hi,
There has been lately some attention to perfect forward secrecy in TLS,
mainly due to an article on netcraft:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2013/06/25/ssl-intercepted-today-decrypted-tomorrow.html
What worries me is that apache still fixes the DH group size to 1024
bit. If one uses an RSA
12 matches
Mail list logo
