On 30.01.2014 22:51, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
>> I wasn't sure of the details of the current implementation either. Would
>> it be
>> appropriate to have SSL_CONF usable with SSLProxy* too?
>>
>
> Surely "yes" is the answer; i.e., there is or will be
On 31.01.2014 19:23, Falco Schwarz wrote:
> I tested the patch altering the SSLCertificate* directives with httpd-2.4.x
> and OpenSSL-1.0.2-dev:
> https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-2.4.x-certkeyfile.diff
Thank you for testing and for the report.
> When putting certificate, CA and en
Am 31.01.2014 12:17, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 30.01.2014 18:47, schrieb Eric Covener:
>> I think a link here is good for posterity
>
> thanks again for feedback
>
> mod_rewrite doesn't expose client_addr
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56094
https://issues.apache.org/bu
Hi All,
I just want to check if there are feedback/comments to this patch?
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 3:26 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT support
Dear All,
Our analysis of Apache httpd 2.4.
Hi Graham,
Thanks for giving me the opportunity to describe what I need to achieve.
Here is what I can glean from my recent trail of breadcrumbs:
1. Configure the session cookie to be deleted when a browser is restarted,
regardless of the session expiry.
2. Ability to utilize a session without r
I tested the patch altering the SSLCertificate* directives with httpd-2.4.x and
OpenSSL-1.0.2-dev:
https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-2.4.x-certkeyfile.diff
When putting certificate, CA and encrypted private key all in one file and
using only the directive SSLCertificateFile, I encou
Am 30.01.2014 18:47, schrieb Eric Covener:
> I think a link here is good for posterity
thanks again for feedback
mod_rewrite doesn't expose client_addr
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56094
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 30 Jan 2014, at 7:01 PM, Erik Pearson wrote:
> On this specific sub-thread, you chose to single out a single topic. When you
> asked "I'm not following the problem you're trying to solve.", I chose to
> list the number of enhancements and bugs that I've encountered over a few
> days of work