On Thursday 20 February 2014 16:13:01 Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:04 AM, André Malo wrote:
> > Anyone?
> >
> > The doc build tools are confused as well ;-)
> >
> > nd
> >
> > On Sunday 16 February 2014 15:58:18 André Malo wrote:
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> We do have one duplicat
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Maybe what you need is a new ProxyPreserveHost on/off/canon option so
> that mod_proxy uses the ServerName to fill in the Host header (hence
> the SNI and the "proxy-request-hostname" note checked later by mod_ssl
> against the CN).
>
> I may
Dne Pá 21. února 2014 10:08:42, Yann Ylavic napsal(a):
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > Maybe what you need is a new ProxyPreserveHost on/off/canon option so
> > that mod_proxy uses the ServerName to fill in the Host header (hence
> > the SNI and the "proxy-request-hostna
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Pavel Matěja wrote:
> Dne Pá 21. února 2014 10:08:42, Yann Ylavic napsal(a):
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> > Maybe what you need is a new ProxyPreserveHost on/off/canon option so
>> > that mod_proxy uses the ServerName to fill in the
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Pavel Matěja wrote:
>> Currently there are two possible scenarios with SSLCheckProxyPeerName On and
>> numeric Host/URI:
>> 1) you will try to open new connection which will fail the CN check and
>> client gets
Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cedric Roijakkers
Date: Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:44 AM
Subject: [users@httpd] Performance drop in 2.4.7 versus 2.4.6
To: "us...@httpd.apache.org"
Hi All,
As most of you, we're running Apache in a production set-u
On 21/02/2014 13:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
>
> Is anybody else seeing the same behavior? Looking at the documentation, 2.4.7
> has gained some performance improvements, but I’m seeing something different
> on
> my end.
>
Perhaps it's the increased DH parame
Am 21.02.2014 14:13, schrieb Dr Stephen Henson:
> On 21/02/2014 13:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
>>
>> Is anybody else seeing the same behavior? Looking at the documentation, 2.4.7
>> has gained some performance improvements, but I’m seeing something different
>> on
On 21/02/2014 13:13, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
> On 21/02/2014 13:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
>>
>> Is anybody else seeing the same behavior? Looking at the documentation, 2.4.7
>> has gained some performance improvements, but I’m seeing something different
>> on
>>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Graham Dumpleton <
graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 21 February 2014 02:23, Joe Orton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:52:34AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> > WSGI 3.4 daemon mode crashing with httpd 2.4.x...
>> >
>> > Program received signal SI
Dne Pá 21. února 2014 13:55:56, Yann Ylavic napsal(a):
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Pavel Matěja wrote:
> >> Currently there are two possible scenarios with SSLCheckProxyPeerName On
> >> and numeric Host/URI:
> >> 1) you will try to op
It would be interesting to see if removing SSL entirely
made any difference to the delta between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7...
On Feb 21, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Cedric Roijakkers
> Date: Fri, Feb 21, 20
Dne Pá 21. února 2014 15:13:25, Pavel MatÄja napsal(a):
> Dne Pá 21. února 2014 13:55:56, Yann Ylavic napsal(a):
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Pavel MatÄja wrote:
> > >> Currently there are two possible scenarios with SSLChe
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:24:23PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> BTW, do you know if there's a known collection of patches for 2.4 support
> or for other critical fixes?
This shows what we have in Fedora, FWIW:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mod_wsgi.git/tree/
... all of which are in the upst
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:24:25AM +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> Crap. I thought those httpd 2.4 fixes were already in mod_wsgi 3.4.
>
> Another reason I have to get off my backside and release an updated
> version. Has been too long.
That would be very useful!
> And yes mod_wsgi does lots of
Dear All.
Please, explain what functionality now in trunk and what plans for
mod_fcgid. I miss FastCGIExternalServer feature.
The problem is to allow different site parts to be processed by
different FastCGI servers (frankly speaking, by different php-fpm
pools). Also,t
On 21.02.2014 11:56, ? ?? wrote:
> But mod_fastcgi doesn't compile with Apache 2.4.
This is entirely possible, actually -- and has been for a while. Pathes exist
and are maintained:
https://github.com/ByteInternet/libapache-mod-fastcgi
Yours,
-mi
Thank you for suggestion.
But this packet does not install "from box" in
FreeBSD. It does not install via "apxs -cia" also. Besides that
there is a patch for mod_fastcgi in FreeBSD ports that doesn't seem
trivial.
> On 21.02.2014 11:56, Антон Панков wrote:
>
> But mod_fastcg
On 21.02.2014 13:59, Anthony Pankov wrote:
> Thank you for suggestion.
> But this packet does not install "from box" in
> FreeBSD. It does not install via "apxs -cia" also. Besides that
> there is a patch for mod_fastcgi in FreeBSD ports that doesn't seem
> trivial.
Unless apa...@freebsd.
Helo,
I'm facing some issue(s).while validating mod_rewrite
+proxy
with uds.
Here is my simple conf :
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule "^/(.*)$" "unix:/tmp/backend.sock|http://localhost/$1";
[P,NE]
http://localhost"; disablereuse=off>
First, the (pseudo-)scheme "unix:" is unknown
On 2/21/2014 6:56 PM, Антон Панков wrote:
Dear All.
Please, explain what functionality now in trunk and what plans for
mod_fcgid. I miss FastCGIExternalServer feature.
I am in the final stages of testing a new FastCGI module, written for 2.4
(although it MAY work on 2.2) called mod_extfcgi
On 18.02.2014 15:53, Pavel Matěja wrote:
> Hi,
> since we've enabled SSLProxyCheckPeerName our reverserse proxy I can see
> AH00052: child pid 5711 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
> in our logs during Nessus scans.
>
> Backend server has several X509v3 Subject Alternative Names and Nessus send
On 20.02.2014 04:18, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Can anyone offer background as to why httpd 2.4 branch ./configure likes
>
> checking for OpenSSL... checking for user-provided OpenSSL base
> directory... /usr/local/ssl adding "-I/usr/local/ssl/include" to
> CPPFLAGS setting MOD_CFLAGS to "-I/usr
23 matches
Mail list logo
