On 20.02.2014 04:18, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Can anyone offer background as to why httpd 2.4 branch ./configure likes
>
> checking for OpenSSL... checking for user-provided OpenSSL base
> directory... /usr/local/ssl adding "-I/usr/local/ssl/include" to
> CPPFLAGS setting MOD_CFLAGS to "-I/usr
On 18.02.2014 15:53, Pavel Matěja wrote:
> Hi,
> since we've enabled SSLProxyCheckPeerName our reverserse proxy I can see
> AH00052: child pid 5711 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
> in our logs during Nessus scans.
>
> Backend server has several X509v3 Subject Alternative Names and Nessus send
On 2/21/2014 6:56 PM, Антон Панков wrote:
Dear All.
Please, explain what functionality now in trunk and what plans for
mod_fcgid. I miss FastCGIExternalServer feature.
I am in the final stages of testing a new FastCGI module, written for 2.4
(although it MAY work on 2.2) called mod_extfcgi
Helo,
I'm facing some issue(s).while validating mod_rewrite
+proxy
with uds.
Here is my simple conf :
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule "^/(.*)$" "unix:/tmp/backend.sock|http://localhost/$1";
[P,NE]
http://localhost"; disablereuse=off>
First, the (pseudo-)scheme "unix:" is unknown
On 21.02.2014 13:59, Anthony Pankov wrote:
> Thank you for suggestion.
> But this packet does not install "from box" in
> FreeBSD. It does not install via "apxs -cia" also. Besides that
> there is a patch for mod_fastcgi in FreeBSD ports that doesn't seem
> trivial.
Unless apa...@freebsd.
Thank you for suggestion.
But this packet does not install "from box" in
FreeBSD. It does not install via "apxs -cia" also. Besides that
there is a patch for mod_fastcgi in FreeBSD ports that doesn't seem
trivial.
> On 21.02.2014 11:56, Антон Панков wrote:
>
> But mod_fastcg
On 21.02.2014 11:56, ? ?? wrote:
> But mod_fastcgi doesn't compile with Apache 2.4.
This is entirely possible, actually -- and has been for a while. Pathes exist
and are maintained:
https://github.com/ByteInternet/libapache-mod-fastcgi
Yours,
-mi
Dear All.
Please, explain what functionality now in trunk and what plans for
mod_fcgid. I miss FastCGIExternalServer feature.
The problem is to allow different site parts to be processed by
different FastCGI servers (frankly speaking, by different php-fpm
pools). Also,t
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:24:25AM +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> Crap. I thought those httpd 2.4 fixes were already in mod_wsgi 3.4.
>
> Another reason I have to get off my backside and release an updated
> version. Has been too long.
That would be very useful!
> And yes mod_wsgi does lots of
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:24:23PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> BTW, do you know if there's a known collection of patches for 2.4 support
> or for other critical fixes?
This shows what we have in Fedora, FWIW:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mod_wsgi.git/tree/
... all of which are in the upst
Dne Pá 21. února 2014 15:13:25, Pavel MatÄja napsal(a):
> Dne Pá 21. února 2014 13:55:56, Yann Ylavic napsal(a):
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Pavel MatÄja wrote:
> > >> Currently there are two possible scenarios with SSLChe
It would be interesting to see if removing SSL entirely
made any difference to the delta between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7...
On Feb 21, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Cedric Roijakkers
> Date: Fri, Feb 21, 20
Dne Pá 21. února 2014 13:55:56, Yann Ylavic napsal(a):
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Pavel Matěja wrote:
> >> Currently there are two possible scenarios with SSLCheckProxyPeerName On
> >> and numeric Host/URI:
> >> 1) you will try to op
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Graham Dumpleton <
graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 21 February 2014 02:23, Joe Orton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:52:34AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> > WSGI 3.4 daemon mode crashing with httpd 2.4.x...
>> >
>> > Program received signal SI
On 21/02/2014 13:13, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
> On 21/02/2014 13:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
>>
>> Is anybody else seeing the same behavior? Looking at the documentation, 2.4.7
>> has gained some performance improvements, but I’m seeing something different
>> on
>>
Am 21.02.2014 14:13, schrieb Dr Stephen Henson:
> On 21/02/2014 13:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
>>
>> Is anybody else seeing the same behavior? Looking at the documentation, 2.4.7
>> has gained some performance improvements, but I’m seeing something different
>> on
On 21/02/2014 13:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
>
> Is anybody else seeing the same behavior? Looking at the documentation, 2.4.7
> has gained some performance improvements, but I’m seeing something different
> on
> my end.
>
Perhaps it's the increased DH parame
Including dev@httpd.apache.org...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cedric Roijakkers
Date: Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:44 AM
Subject: [users@httpd] Performance drop in 2.4.7 versus 2.4.6
To: "us...@httpd.apache.org"
Hi All,
As most of you, we're running Apache in a production set-u
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Pavel Matěja wrote:
>> Currently there are two possible scenarios with SSLCheckProxyPeerName On and
>> numeric Host/URI:
>> 1) you will try to open new connection which will fail the CN check and
>> client gets
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Pavel Matěja wrote:
> Dne Pá 21. února 2014 10:08:42, Yann Ylavic napsal(a):
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> > Maybe what you need is a new ProxyPreserveHost on/off/canon option so
>> > that mod_proxy uses the ServerName to fill in the
Dne Pá 21. února 2014 10:08:42, Yann Ylavic napsal(a):
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > Maybe what you need is a new ProxyPreserveHost on/off/canon option so
> > that mod_proxy uses the ServerName to fill in the Host header (hence
> > the SNI and the "proxy-request-hostna
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Maybe what you need is a new ProxyPreserveHost on/off/canon option so
> that mod_proxy uses the ServerName to fill in the Host header (hence
> the SNI and the "proxy-request-hostname" note checked later by mod_ssl
> against the CN).
>
> I may
On Thursday 20 February 2014 16:13:01 Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:04 AM, André Malo wrote:
> > Anyone?
> >
> > The doc build tools are confused as well ;-)
> >
> > nd
> >
> > On Sunday 16 February 2014 15:58:18 André Malo wrote:
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> We do have one duplicat
23 matches
Mail list logo