RE: SO_REUSEPORT in the children processes

2014-03-10 Thread Lu, Yingqi
Hi Yann, As we pointed out in our original discussion thread, we dropped the child process implementation due to the kernel defect with changing the number of open sockets. Now, we quickly tested this child process implementation (prefork) with our workload on a modern Xeon dual sockets server

Re: Rich is looking for a substitute httpd talk for Denver

2014-03-10 Thread Rich Bowen
On 02/25/2014 04:53 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:18:25 -0500 Eric Covener wrote: We had a cancellation for one of the httpd talks for Denver, any proposals to fill the slot that either didn't make the first cut or didn't get submitted at all? An alternative option mi

RE: T&R 2.4.8 Plan

2014-03-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Done. Regards Rüdiger > -Original Message- > From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Sent: Montag, 10. März 2014 12:28 > To: httpd > Subject: Re: T&R 2.4.8 Plan > > One more +1 in 2.4.x/STATUS for draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-23 > conformance? > It is already accepted for n

Re: UDS support for mod_rewrite

2014-03-10 Thread ryo takatsuki
Thanks for the clarification! 2014-03-10 13:05 GMT+01:00 Yann Ylavic : > Hi Juanjo, > > the patch with mod_rewrite is still being worked on (see > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg59276.html), > precisely because it is not possible, yet, to refer to a defined > backend ( declar

Re: UDS support for mod_rewrite

2014-03-10 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi Juanjo, the patch with mod_rewrite is still being worked on (see https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg59276.html), precisely because it is not possible, yet, to refer to a defined backend ( declared, as you did in this thread) with a RewriteRule. The default proxy only is used,

Re: UDS support for mod_rewrite

2014-03-10 Thread ryo takatsuki
Hi all, Quick question related to UDS and mod_rewrite. I see the UDS patches have been backported to 2.4.8 but the fix for making mod_rewrite and UDS was not included. Was that intended? I'm referring to r1560367 Best regards, Juanjo. 2014-01-27 15:12 GMT+01:00 ryo takatsuki : > It is working p

Re: T&R 2.4.8 Plan

2014-03-10 Thread Yann Ylavic
One more +1 in 2.4.x/STATUS for draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-23 conformance? It is already accepted for next 2.2.x. Regards, Yann. On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Actually, I will do a T&R today, if all goes well. > > On Mar 4, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Re: Logging multiple values for the same cookie name?

2014-03-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > So I am happy to agree with the semicolon list delimiter for logging. > On Mar 7, 2014 5:09 PM, "Yann Ylavic" wrote: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 12:06 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > > > > On Mar 7, 2014 4:50 PM, "Yann Ylavic" wrote: >

Re: T&R 2.4.8 Plan

2014-03-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
Actually, I will do a T&R today, if all goes well. On Mar 4, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I plan to T&R 2.4.8 tomorrow (Wednesday) and, assuming all > goes well, release and announce on Monday. >

Turn off SSL session tickets

2014-03-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Reading the trunk documentation it seems possible to turn off SSL session tickets via SSLOpenSSLConfCmd Options -SessionTicket I assume there are no other options doing so on 2.2.x and 2.4.x, correct? Regards Rüdiger

RE: Logging multiple values for the same cookie name?

2014-03-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
+1 Regards Rüdiger > -Original Message- > From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Sent: Freitag, 7. März 2014 22:50 > To: httpd > Subject: Re: Logging multiple values for the same cookie name? > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:29 PM, André Malo wrote: > > * William A. Rowe Jr. wr