Hi Christophe, Jim and Yann,
Thank you very much for your consideration of putting SO_REUSEPORT patch in the
2.4 stable release.
I am also very happy that you find the white paper :-) All the most recent
testing results are included in the white paper. Also, we have tested the
(graceful) rest
I never assume it is easy. As far as AIX goes, it would be "easier" for me,
as a packager to ignore AIX 5.3. But, for now, what I package for AIX 5.3
(TL7 and later) also works on AIX 6.1 and AIX 7.1 - unchanged.
Getting people to update is hard. Some do it automatically - proud to be
bleading edg
FWIW...
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
> From my perspective - as a simple packager (re: openssl - old versions) I
> run into the problem of only being able to get to 0.9.8.k (AIX 5.3 TL12)
>
So, an operating system that has been unsupported for the past 2 years,
check...
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
>
> Maybe, 2.4.14 could focus on reviewing/merging this patch and associated
> performance improvement?
> To help adoption, maybe an ASF server could be upgraded with a SO_REUSEPORT
> patched version of Apache to have our own measurements a
Actually, I was going to test that exact patch this weekend, in hopes
of getting it into 2.4
> On May 8, 2015, at 3:44 AM, Christophe JAILLET
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The SO_REUSEPORT patch has been in trunk for a few months now and has been
> proposed for backport in 2.4.x.
>
> Here is an inter
Hi,
The SO_REUSEPORT patch has been in trunk for a few months now and has
been proposed for backport in 2.4.x.
Here is an interesting paper which gives a clear explanation and some
benchmark results:
http://www.intel.ie/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/scaling-apache-serve
>From my perspective - as a simple packager (re: openssl - old versions) I
run into the problem of only being able to get to 0.9.8.k (AIX 5.3 TL12).
With AIX 6.1 and 7.1 it would be openssl-1.0.0(something - do not know by
memory what patchlevel IBM openssl.base is at). Personally, I am going to
lo
