Just a quick /nag that I'm happy to roll 2.2.30 in conjunction with 2.4.14,
so that we present both to the community at the same time, and simplify
the announcement. This patch still needs a third +1 to be adopted (it is
already in trunk, and in the 2.4.14 Jim will be tagging & rolling shortly).
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
> I can reproduce the first case with the installer, pretty much ondemand
> using our installer stuff. I've tried reproducing it by ripping out the
> actions that do the Runtime.exec() to call httpd.exe into a separate
> standalone program, and t
Subj sez it all.
I can reproduce the first case with the installer, pretty much ondemand
using our installer stuff. I've tried reproducing it by ripping out the
actions that do the Runtime.exec() to call httpd.exe into a separate
standalone program, and the problem doesn't occur there. Go figure.
But when thi
Can you reproduce using the real network driver? The loopback/localhost
interface is famously junk.
On Jun 10, 2015 11:22 AM, "Andy Wang" wrote:
> Yeah, that much I more or less get.
>
> What I really don't understand is what can a client do (IE11) that would
> regularly cause httpd.exe to hang
Yeah, that much I more or less get.
What I really don't understand is what can a client do (IE11) that would
regularly cause httpd.exe to hang with AcceptEx. This is reproducible
on every single machine I've ever tried, including completely vanilla
virtual machines, or pretty straightforward
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Stefan Eissing
>> wrote:
>>> Today I had the second user which got "400 Bad Request" when using mod_h2
>>> with a wildcard certificate. So, I was thinkin
It turns off all advanced socket mechanics for accepting connections. That
means
it won't pre-fetch data. Because of how cobbled-together the WinSock
network
stack drivers (third parties, included) were, there are many things that
break
sendfile (disable sendfile) or socket reuse (disable advance
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>> Today I had the second user which got "400 Bad Request" when using mod_h2
>> with a wildcard certificate. So, I was thinking how to possibly fix the code
>> in mod_ssl.
>>
>> The mo
I originally asked this on user@httpd and didn't get a response, so
thought I'd redirect to dev and see if anyone can explain why this would
occur if you have time. I have to admit, it's a curiosity to me, that I
just don't want to let go until I understand it and what research I've
done into
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> Today I had the second user which got "400 Bad Request" when using mod_h2
> with a wildcard certificate. So, I was thinking how to possibly fix the code
> in mod_ssl.
>
> The mostly harmless approach is the addition of a configuration dire
Today I had the second user which got "400 Bad Request" when using mod_h2 with
a wildcard certificate. So, I was thinking how to possibly fix the code in
mod_ssl.
The mostly harmless approach is the addition of a configuration directive that
admins may use to explicitly allow multiple host requ
On Tue 2015-06-09 13:43:59 -0400, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> WRT renegotiation, it is fair to say that the WG punted on the idea
> due to lack of time. If someone figures out a way to safely
> renegotiate an h2 connection (and all of its streams), then go ahead
> and implement it, describe it in an
13 matches
Mail list logo
