On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> [X] +1: Good to go
No regression with event and worker, included apr-1.5.2 and apr-util-1.5.4.
Tested systems:
* Debian 8 - amd64
* Debian 7 - amd64
* Debian 6 - amd64
* Debian 6 - amd64 - mixed 32/64bit system/kernel:
Thanks Jim,
Yann.
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.14 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.14 GA.
>
> [X] +1: Good to go
Go for re
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
>>>
Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung
> wrote:
>
>> Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
>>
>>> Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
>>> Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
> Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
>
>> Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
>> Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day ago) by jim
>> File length: 57106 byte(s)
>> Diff to previous 1
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> It doesn't make sense for us to hold up a release when that change has
>>> been in the last several releases however. (That's a high barrier for
>>> making progress.)
>>>
>>>
> There seems to be a 2.4.8 component and an actual 2.4.13 compon
Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day ago) by jim
File length: 57106 byte(s)
Diff to previous 1674655 (colored)
Merge r1676085 from trunk:
consistently output SSL
Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day ago) by jim
File length: 57106 byte(s)
Diff to previous 1674655 (colored)
Merge r1676085 from trunk:
consistently output SSLCertificateChainFile deprecation warnings
Submitted
Am 12.06.2015 um 18:48 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jacob Perkins
mailto:jacob.perk...@cpanel.net>> wrote:
+1 to Noels comments. We have a ton of servers running Apache 2.4
with our control panel. Doing this in a point release will cause us
to have to cha
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the response. You’re right, this does look to be in Apache 2.2.12
at this time. I was taking this from CHANGES, and it states:
Changes with Apache 2.4.13
*) mod_ssl: make sure to consistently output SSLCertificateChainFile
deprecation warnings, when encountered in a
>
> It doesn't make sense for us to hold up a release when that change has
>> been in the last several releases however. (That's a high barrier for
>> making progress.)
>>
>>
There seems to be a 2.4.8 component and an actual 2.4.13 component. Did the
2.4.13 fix make it more frequent.
(fixing my t
There seems to be a 2.4.8 component and an actual 2.4.13 component. Did the
2.4.13 fix make it more frequent?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:49 PM Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jacob Perkins
> wrote:
>
>> +1 to Noels comments. We have a ton of servers running Apache 2.4 w
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jacob Perkins
wrote:
> +1 to Noels comments. We have a ton of servers running Apache 2.4 with
> our control panel. Doing this in a point release will cause us to have to
> change our product instead of doing a regular Apache release.
>
> When you have a server
+1 to Noels comments. We have a ton of servers running Apache 2.4 with our
control panel. Doing this in a point release will cause us to have to change
our product instead of doing a regular Apache release.
When you have a server with 10k+ SSL vhosts, this can cause massive, unexpected
proble
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
> Am 12.06.2015 um 13:49 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Christophe JAILLET
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> should this warning at startup be an issue, why not just remove it in
>>> 2.4.x
>>> and keep it in
Am 12.06.2015 um 13:49 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
should this warning at startup be an issue, why not just remove it in 2.4.x
and keep it in trunk?
Having the depreciation written in doc (and in migration note for 2.4 ->
2.6/
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> IMHO the ap_retained_data_get/create APIs make this "nicer" than this older
> pattern.
Ah yes, good catch, I just did not think about it.
>
> retained = ap_retained_data_get(userdata_key);
> if (!retained) {
> retained = a
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:07 AM, wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Fri Jun 12 09:07:34 2015
> New Revision: 1685052
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685052
> Log:
> mod_ssl: Warn about deprecated SSLCertificateChainFile once at startup,
> on first usage only.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/C
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
>
> should this warning at startup be an issue, why not just remove it in 2.4.x
> and keep it in trunk?
> Having the depreciation written in doc (and in migration note for 2.4 ->
> 2.6/3.0 one day) could be enough, no?
Pro
Hi,
should this warning at startup be an issue, why not just remove it in
2.4.x and keep it in trunk?
Having the depreciation written in doc (and in migration note for 2.4 ->
2.6/3.0 one day) could be enough, no?
BTW, the apr_pstrdup(ap_pglobal, "1") could be just "1".
CJ
Le 12/06/2015 11:
20 matches
Mail list logo
