[VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.16 as GA

2015-07-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.16 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.16 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. Vote will last the normal 72 hr

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R 2.4.16 next week

2015-07-10 Thread William A Rowe Jr
If you are hung up today, I'll go ahead and roll early this evening. Looks like zero churn for the past couple weeks, a bit of bug fixing and diagnosis, so looking rock solid. On Jul 9, 2015 8:16 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: > Considering the amount of churn, I will T&R tomorrow am (Friday) to > g

Re: trunk/modules/http2 built and tested

2015-07-10 Thread William A Rowe Jr
You can do an svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/mod_h2 svn cp -r1690247 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ http2/sandbox https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/mod_h2/trunk to shift that all over to the test tree, perhaps integrate into test/fram

Re: protocol negotiation

2015-07-10 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Some weeks ago the backporting of the ALPN patch was rejected as > a more generic approach was asked for. > > Some hinted that an approach of defining a list of supported > "Protocols" per server/vhost and a general registry for some > call

Re: trunk/modules/http2 built and tested

2015-07-10 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 10.07.2015 um 17:04 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Stefan Eissing >> wrote: >> FYI: just checked in a modules/http2 that takes part in the build >> process, similar options as mod_ssl >> >> --enable-h2 >> --with-nghttp2= >> >> Tests were removed, so

Re: svn commit: r1690248 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ docs/conf/ docs/conf/extra/ docs/manual/mod/ modules/ modules/http2/ modules/http2/m4/ modules/http2/mod-h2.xcodeproj/ modules/http2/mod_h2/

2015-07-10 Thread Stefan Eissing
That was a small surprise, yes. Some checks in trunk did not like r->hostname to still have the port. > Am 10.07.2015 um 16:59 schrieb Eric Covener : > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:45 AM, wrote: >> Copied: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_task.c (from r1690246, >> httpd/httpd/trunk/modul

Re: trunk/modules/http2 built and tested

2015-07-10 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Stefan Eissing < stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > FYI: just checked in a modules/http2 that takes part in the build > process, similar options as mod_ssl > > --enable-h2 > --with-nghttp2= > > Tests were removed, so all sandbox/* is gone. Instead, I transf

Re: svn commit: r1690248 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ docs/conf/ docs/conf/extra/ docs/manual/mod/ modules/ modules/http2/ modules/http2/m4/ modules/http2/mod-h2.xcodeproj/ modules/http2/mod_h2/

2015-07-10 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:45 AM, wrote: > Copied: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_task.c (from r1690246, > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/mod_h2/h2_task.c) > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_task.c?p2=httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_task.c&p1=httpd/h

protocol negotiation

2015-07-10 Thread Stefan Eissing
Some weeks ago the backporting of the ALPN patch was rejected as a more generic approach was asked for. Some hinted that an approach of defining a list of supported "Protocols" per server/vhost and a general registry for some callbacks where mod_ssl and mod_h2 would work with. This and the 421

trunk/modules/http2 built and tested

2015-07-10 Thread Stefan Eissing
FYI: just checked in a modules/http2 that takes part in the build process, similar options as mod_ssl --enable-h2 --with-nghttp2= Tests were removed, so all sandbox/* is gone. Instead, I transformed my git mod_h2 into a repository with just the test setup and cases. If interested, you may f

Re: Using UPN from subjectAltName with SSLUserName

2015-07-10 Thread Jan Kaluža
On 06/29/2015 03:14 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 01:47:45PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 05:11:57PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote: On 22.06.2015 10:37, Jan Pazdziora wrote: Please find a new patch attached which I hope covers all the parts you've outlined

[PATCH 57044] Use base64url in UNIQUE_ID

2015-07-10 Thread Michael Kaufmann
Hi, in bug 57044, I proposed to use base64url for UNIQUE_ID. This means that the character '_' shall be used instead of '@', because '@' is not URL-safe. '_' is, and it may be used without percent-encoding in URLs, HTTP headers, or cookie values. What do you think? Does anyone dare to com