The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.16 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.16 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72 hr
If you are hung up today, I'll go ahead and roll early this evening. Looks
like zero churn for the past couple weeks, a bit of bug fixing and
diagnosis, so looking rock solid.
On Jul 9, 2015 8:16 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> Considering the amount of churn, I will T&R tomorrow am (Friday) to
> g
You can do an
svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/mod_h2
svn cp -r1690247 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/
http2/sandbox https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/mod_h2/trunk
to shift that all over to the test tree, perhaps integrate into
test/fram
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> Some weeks ago the backporting of the ALPN patch was rejected as
> a more generic approach was asked for.
>
> Some hinted that an approach of defining a list of supported
> "Protocols" per server/vhost and a general registry for some
> call
> Am 10.07.2015 um 17:04 schrieb William A Rowe Jr :
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Stefan Eissing
>> wrote:
>> FYI: just checked in a modules/http2 that takes part in the build
>> process, similar options as mod_ssl
>>
>> --enable-h2
>> --with-nghttp2=
>>
>> Tests were removed, so
That was a small surprise, yes. Some checks in trunk did not like r->hostname
to still have the port.
> Am 10.07.2015 um 16:59 schrieb Eric Covener :
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:45 AM, wrote:
>> Copied: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_task.c (from r1690246,
>> httpd/httpd/trunk/modul
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Stefan Eissing <
stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> FYI: just checked in a modules/http2 that takes part in the build
> process, similar options as mod_ssl
>
> --enable-h2
> --with-nghttp2=
>
> Tests were removed, so all sandbox/* is gone. Instead, I transf
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:45 AM, wrote:
> Copied: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_task.c (from r1690246,
> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/mod_h2/h2_task.c)
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_task.c?p2=httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_task.c&p1=httpd/h
Some weeks ago the backporting of the ALPN patch was rejected as
a more generic approach was asked for.
Some hinted that an approach of defining a list of supported
"Protocols" per server/vhost and a general registry for some
callbacks where mod_ssl and mod_h2 would work with.
This and the 421
FYI: just checked in a modules/http2 that takes part in the build
process, similar options as mod_ssl
--enable-h2
--with-nghttp2=
Tests were removed, so all sandbox/* is gone. Instead, I transformed my
git mod_h2 into a repository with just the test setup and cases. If
interested, you may f
On 06/29/2015 03:14 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 01:47:45PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 05:11:57PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 22.06.2015 10:37, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Please find a new patch attached which I hope covers all the
parts you've outlined
Hi,
in bug 57044, I proposed to use base64url for UNIQUE_ID. This means
that the character '_' shall be used instead of '@', because '@' is
not URL-safe. '_' is, and it may be used without percent-encoding in
URLs, HTTP headers, or cookie values.
What do you think? Does anyone dare to com
12 matches
Mail list logo