On 7/14/2015 12:09 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
link.exe -lib @C:\Users\runtime\AppData\Local\Temp\nm9E02.tmp
"c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.exe" -
nologo -f libaprutil.mak CFG="libaprutil - Win32 Release" RECURSE=0
if not exist ".\Release
On Jul 14, 2015 10:16 AM, "Jeff Trawick" wrote:
>
> Thanks/Sorry :(
Entirely my fault, I was in sync with progress to late last evening, and
skimmed the morning thread. No objections to reworking the release,
although my schedule keeps getting interrupted.
Later this evening it will be ready fo
On 07/14/2015 01:47 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
You know 2.2 has .mak files in the source. They've been given no love in
a long time but nothing major has changed for them to need it AFAIK.
Those should make your automating life simple.
nmake /f makefile.win [options] installr
I was never able t
You know 2.2 has .mak files in the source. They've been given no love in
a long time but nothing major has changed for them to need it AFAIK.
Those should make your automating life simple.
nmake /f makefile.win [options] installr
On 7/14/2015 9:03 AM, Andy Wang wrote:
On 07/14/2015 10:53 AM
On 07/14/2015 10:53 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
cmake support for 2.2 should be a straightforward adjustment to 2.4
cmake ;) (not anywhere visible on my priority list)
Nor should it be :)
Not for 2.2 at least.
Honestly, I'd like to get all our customers on 2.2 to 2.4 asap. It
would save me
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andy Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/14/2015 10:36 AM, Mario Brandt wrote:
>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> at least for the 2.4 there is a script on github [1]
>>
>> Maybe you can adopt that for 2.2. I wonder why you still want 2.2.
>> Unless you use some exotic modules that do no b
Is there already additional information about this CVE, this to assess the
risk.
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3183
Well,i just figured out #2 and #3
devenv /upgrade Apache.sln
devenv /build Release /project InstallBin
So just the dsw to sln conversion/save is manual now.
Andy
On 07/14/2015 10:36 AM, Andy Wang wrote:
I should add that I've done a little big of digging into MS
documentation and googling, an
On 07/14/2015 10:36 AM, Mario Brandt wrote:
Hi Andy,
at least for the 2.4 there is a script on github [1]
Maybe you can adopt that for 2.2. I wonder why you still want 2.2.
Unless you use some exotic modules that do no build with 2.4, 2.4 is
the better option.
[1] https://github.com/winlib
I should add that I've done a little big of digging into MS
documentation and googling, and I think there is no way around a manual
dsw-sln conversion.
devenv.com has a /Upgrade option that will probably do #2 for me , but I
don't think there's a way around the dsw to sln conversion.
So I'm
Hi Andy,
at least for the 2.4 there is a script on github [1]
Maybe you can adopt that for 2.2. I wonder why you still want 2.2.
Unless you use some exotic modules that do no build with 2.4, 2.4 is
the better option.
[1] https://github.com/winlibs/apache
I wanted to just send a quick email out to see if anyone is familiar
enough with the windows compile process to see if there are any thoughts
on how to improve what I'm doing.
So a few quick points
1) i'm using the unix source to prep the source tree
2) i'm not using any external makefiles/visu
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:54 AM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:06 AM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 11, 2015 10:29 AM, "William A Rowe Jr"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.30, can be found
>> in;
>> >
>> > htt
Hi Jim,
This commit breaks our website, since the mirror they are directed to may
or may not contain the current advertised 2.4.12 based on exactly when that
specific mirror rsync's.
Please hold off 24 hours before committing the svn rm side of the svn mv in
the future... so that mirrors still ho
OK. Case solved. test/framework/trunk found hardly innocent:
On my Parallels Ubuntu image, the lines
127.0.0.1 localhost
::1 localhost
existed. But the httpd.conf which is generated by t/TEST does a
Listen 0.0.0.0:8529
which is a mix of ipv4/ipv6 that causes the startup to wait
i
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:06 AM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2015 10:29 AM, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
>
> >
> > The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.30, can be found
> in;
> >
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> [+1] Release 2.2.30 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr
On 07/14/2015 08:06 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
The PROXY_DECLARE bug doesn't seem to be a showstopper, the announce can
make note of that fix.
With that issue addressed, this is my +1 for release.
I think that makes sense. If you've already gone through the
contortions of build from s
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:06 AM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2015 10:29 AM, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
>
> >
> > The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.30, can be found
> in;
> >
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> [+1] Release 2.2.30 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr
On Jul 11, 2015 10:29 AM, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
>
> The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.30, can be found
in;
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
[+1] Release 2.2.30 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr-util 1.5.4)
The PROXY_DECLARE bug doesn't seem to be a showstopper, the a
After 72+ hours, and with all +1 votes (more than 3 of which
were binding) and no -1 votes, I call this vote CLOSED with
a result that the vote PASSES!
Thx to all testers and committers!
I will start the push of the tarballs to the mirrors.
20 matches
Mail list logo
