Re: [PATCH] Add "FreeListen" to support IP_FREEBIND

On Mar 7, 2016 21:59, "Yehuda Katz" wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> On Mar 7, 2016 13:54, "Jan Kaluža" wrote: >> > >> > On 03/07/2016 04:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >> Intstead of

Re: [PATCH] Add "FreeListen" to support IP_FREEBIND

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Mar 7, 2016 13:54, "Jan Kaluža" wrote: > > > > On 03/07/2016 04:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> > >> Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it > >> be possible to somehow

Re: [PATCH] Add "FreeListen" to support IP_FREEBIND

On Mar 7, 2016 13:54, "Jan Kaluža" wrote: > > On 03/07/2016 04:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it >> be possible to somehow leverage Listen itself, maybe with some >> sort of flag? > > > Yes, that would be quite

Re: [PATCH] Add "FreeListen" to support IP_FREEBIND

On 03/07/2016 04:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it be possible to somehow leverage Listen itself, maybe with some sort of flag? Yes, that would be quite possible. I was thinking about that way, but I have chosen YAD as a first approach.

Re: [PATCH] Add "FreeListen" to support IP_FREEBIND

Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it be possible to somehow leverage Listen itself, maybe with some sort of flag? > On Mar 7, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote: > > Hi, > > attached patch adds new "FreeListen" directive. The difference between >

[PATCH] Add "FreeListen" to support IP_FREEBIND

Hi, attached patch adds new "FreeListen" directive. The difference between "Listen" and "FreeListen" is that "FreeListen" sets the IP_FREEBIND socket option on platforms where this is available. It is therefore possible to start the server even when particular IP address set in the