> Am 26.04.2016 um 23:57 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>> Today I Learned the difference between writing
>> DATA + META
>> and
>> DATA + META + FLUSH
>> to the core output filters. I am
> Am 27.04.2016 um 03:53 schrieb William A Rowe Jr :
>
>
> My gut instinct is to propose scoreboard.c for a full svn revert back
> to a working state,
I did not realize that it is that deep of a mess now. Please revert, uncomment
the new calls use in http2 and I'll find
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:48 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Reviewing the applicable patch, the
Thanks, done in r1741112 and r1741115.
Regards,
Yann.
G/M from a very warm autumn.
1. Could someone please:
- set the correct EOL type in svn for .\modules\http2\NWGNUproxyht2,
- Patch as per the following to allow builds of \http2 and \ssl
D:\Projects\svn\httpd-trunk>svn diff
Index: modules/http2/NWGNUmod_http2
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:48 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>>
>> Reviewing the applicable patch, the client, request and protocol now
>> appear
>
>
> ... the client, vhost and protocol now
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> Today I Learned the difference between writing
> DATA + META
> and
> DATA + META + FLUSH
> to the core output filters. I am astonished that
> my code ever worked.
>
> Seriously, what is the reason for this
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> Reviewing the applicable patch, the client, request and protocol now appear
>
... the client, vhost and protocol now appear ...
> to persist for idle connections, but the request is still NULL?
>
> Is this by
Reviewing the applicable patch, the client, request and protocol now appear
to persist for idle connections, but the request is still NULL?
Is this by design? Or is something missing from the patch?
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:19 AM, wrote:
> Author: rpluem
> Date: Tue Apr 19
Today I Learned the difference between writing
DATA + META
and
DATA + META + FLUSH
to the core output filters. I am astonished that
my code ever worked.
Seriously, what is the reason for this kind of
implementation? I would like to pass META buckets
in non-blocking way and *not* lose the
Hi Yann,
2016-04-26 12:07 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic :
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> > [CC docs@]
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> [CC docs@]
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, wrote:
>>> Author: ylavic
>>> Date: Tue Apr 26 09:47:46 2016
>>> New
[CC docs@]
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, wrote:
>> Author: ylavic
>> Date: Tue Apr 26 09:47:46 2016
>> New Revision: 1740987
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1740987=rev
>> Log:
>>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Tue Apr 26 09:47:46 2016
> New Revision: 1740987
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1740987=rev
> Log:
> Introduce 'proxy section' context?
This commit does not seem to work, I declared 'proxy section'
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 04/26/2016 02:04 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>> static int ssl_hook_pre_connection(conn_rec *c, void *csd)
>> {
>> -
>> SSLSrvConfigRec *sc;
>> SSLConnRec *sslconn = myConnConfig(c);
>>
>> -if
On 04/26/2016 02:04 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Tue Apr 26 00:04:57 2016
> New Revision: 1740928
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1740928=rev
> Log:
> mod_proxy, mod_ssl: Handle SSLProxy* directives in sections,
> allowing different TLS configurations per
16 matches
Mail list logo