Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

On Aug 11, 2016 15:09, "Eric Covener" wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> It seems that the two need some potentially different > >> rulesets. If you are running a forward proxy, you would want to be quite > >> strict about

Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> It seems that the two need some potentially different >> rulesets. If you are running a forward proxy, you would want to be quite >> strict about the responses. If you are only a gateway of trusted backend >> servers and

Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

> On Aug 11, 2016, at 12:56 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > It seems that the two need some potentially different > rulesets. If you are running a forward proxy, you would want to be quite > strict about the responses. If you are only a gateway of trusted backend >

Re: svn commit: r1755882 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat: ./ modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c

On Aug 11, 2016 1:59 PM, "Rainer Jung" wrote: > > Am 11.08.2016 um 19:53 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: > >> On Aug 10, 2016 4:58 PM, > wrote: >>> >>> >>> Author: rjung >>> Date: Wed Aug 10 21:58:47 2016 >>> New Revision: 1755882 >>>

Re: svn commit: r1755882 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat: ./ modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c

Am 11.08.2016 um 19:53 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Aug 10, 2016 4:58 PM, > wrote: Author: rjung Date: Wed Aug 10 21:58:47 2016 New Revision: 1755882 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1755882=rev Log: Silence more "defined but not used" compiler

Re: svn commit: r1755882 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat: ./ modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c

On Aug 10, 2016 4:58 PM, wrote: > > Author: rjung > Date: Wed Aug 10 21:58:47 2016 > New Revision: 1755882 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1755882=rev > Log: > Silence more "defined but not used" compiler > warnings when building against OpenSSL 0.9.8a. Just a quick

Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > Just to be clear, that is now 2 votes for eliminating the 'classic > parser' > > from all > > of trunk, 2.4.x and 2.2.x branches, and

Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > Since I've heard little support in these past weeks for leaving an HTTP > > strict > > 'logging-only' option, I'm going to rip that

Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Just to be clear, that is now 2 votes for eliminating the 'classic parser' > from all > of trunk, 2.4.x and 2.2.x branches, and using only the strict parser, > unconditionally. > > That's actually 3 votes for

Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Since I've heard little support in these past weeks for leaving an HTTP > strict > 'logging-only' option, I'm going to rip that out, but replace it with > options to > independently toggle HTTPUnsafe and

Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Aug 4, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > > > > Leaving existing users in a broken state of non-compliance with the > primary > > Internet standard we are claiming to implement just

Re: svn commit: r1750953 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c

Hi Luca, it helps at this point in the discussions to post the delta to branches/2.4.x, for all of us to see the delta between 'current' and 'prospective' behaviors, and ignoring the status of trunk for the moment. Attached is that delta... On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Luca Toscano

Re: HTTP/1.1 strict ruleset

> On Aug 4, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > Leaving existing users in a broken state of non-compliance with the primary > Internet standard we are claiming to implement just because of unsubstantiated > FUD is far more frustrating. Bugs get fixed. Users

Re: svn commit: r1750953 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c

2016-08-04 11:52 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > > > 2016-08-02 10:17 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > >> >> 2016-08-01 21:13 GMT+02:00 Jacob Champion >>> >>> >>> As stated above, this is not my first choice -- but I wouldn't oppose it

Re: Frequent wake-ups for mpm_event

2016-08-09 15:02 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Thanks a lot for the feedback, trying to answer to everybody: > > 2016-08-05 15:19 GMT+02:00 Jim Jagielski : > >> If APR_POLLSET_WAKEABLE was more universal and, therefore, >> more widely tested, I'd be +1... as