Sorry I ran out of cycles to jump on this on the 4th, and didn't see anyone
step up,
so I went ahead and still pushed it out a day late/day early this
afternoon. Hope you
had a worthwhile conference. Please help me double check any errors or
omissions,
I think it was already staged correctly.
You'
We have been at 2.4.29-dev for a few days now, are you ready to advance
this proposal?
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:07 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:39:54AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> >> This defect still ap
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> wrote:
> > Is backporting .gdbinit changes to a stable branch CTR or RTC?
>
> I would think CTR for a typical change there is reasonable.
>
+1, this falls into platform-specific
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> wrote:
>> Is backporting .gdbinit changes to a stable branch CTR or RTC?
>
> I would think CTR for a typical change there is reasonable.
+1
Nit: about commit, s/childs/children/
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
> Is backporting .gdbinit changes to a stable branch CTR or RTC?
I would think CTR for a typical change there is reasonable.
Is backporting .gdbinit changes to a stable branch CTR or RTC?
Regards
Rüdiger
