> On Nov 20, 2017, at 4:18 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> I'd like to automate the gathering of private copies of the necessary
> packages for our perl-framework. While Bundle::ApacheTest is
> already present, it describes only what ApacheTest needs to know.
>
> The
I'd like to automate the gathering of private copies of the necessary
packages for our perl-framework. While Bundle::ApacheTest is
already present, it describes only what ApacheTest needs to know.
The example buried as an external under our framework directory
Apache-Test/lib/Bundle
which is
As the author, I'm fine with it being removed. I don't think updating
it would be particularly hard, but I don't have personal interest in
improving mod_proxy with serf at this time.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> While testing the 2.5.0 alpha
Hi Bert,
Am 20.11.2017 um 13:23 schrieb Bert Huijben:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de]
Sent: maandag 20 november 2017 11:40
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Serf support in trunk
+1 for pulling it unless someone steps forward.
Am
Yep, we had some discussions. Language was for me a problem to get my
wishes/issues to get understand. I had also language problems with others on
this list in the past. I mostly do not understand all when posted, and I am
not understood.
It was a pleasure to test mod_md on windows.
The
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de]
> Sent: maandag 20 november 2017 11:40
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Serf support in trunk
>
> +1 for pulling it unless someone steps forward.
>
> > Am 19.11.2017 um 12:49 schrieb Rainer Jung
Disclaimer: Steffen and me got into each others hairs during the development
and testing of mod_md. I often have difficulties understanding what he means.
That led to frustrations on both sides, I suppose.
In the comment below, I find several things factually wrong, so I need to
answer.
> Am
+1 for pulling it unless someone steps forward.
> Am 19.11.2017 um 12:49 schrieb Rainer Jung :
>
> While testing the 2.5.0 alpha candidate I noticed, that our optional use of
> serf in mod_proxy and mpm_event is pretty outdated (so unmaintained):
>
> - the serf API we