Build Update for apache/httpd
-
Build: #1254
Status: Still Failing
Duration: 10 mins and 18 secs
Commit: c483ca4 (trunk)
Author: Yann Ylavic
Message: Whitespace change to force ci.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1884111
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 01:06:11AM -, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Sun Nov 22 01:06:11 2020
> New Revision: 1883708
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1883708=rev
> Log:
> core: reset ap_runtime_dir to NULL after AP_SQ_MS_DESTROY_CONFIG.
>
>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:56 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:05 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >
> > On 12/4/20 1:54 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:44:46PM +0100, Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
> > >> On 12/1/20 4:02 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> > >>> Would a crazy option 4
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:05 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 12/4/20 1:54 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:44:46PM +0100, Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
> >> On 12/1/20 4:02 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> >>> Would a crazy option 4 be to add VENDOR_APLOGNO() which could add a
> >>> prefix to
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:33:29 +
Joe Orton wrote:
> Very occasionally we backport patches to RHEL's httpd package in a
> way that introduces new or different logging output from 2.4/trunk.
> I'm wondering if there is any opinion about vendors asking for for a
> small (say, 100?) reserved range
On 12/4/20 1:54 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:44:46PM +0100, Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
>> On 12/1/20 4:02 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
>>> Would a crazy option 4 be to add VENDOR_APLOGNO() which could add a prefix
>>> to the log number to be used in any patches?
>>>
>>> For example,
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:44:46PM +0100, Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
> On 12/1/20 4:02 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> > Would a crazy option 4 be to add VENDOR_APLOGNO() which could add a prefix
> > to the log number to be used in any patches?
> >
> > For example, V_APLOGNO('R', 123) could produce AHR123
> >
