Graham,
On 5/8/23 05:29, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
On 04 May 2023, at 09:34, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from
Subversion to Git.
This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
via
All,
On 11/29/22 09:20, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I've recently come back to bug 64338
(https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64338) which is an
enhancement I filed back in 2020 with a patch. I got some good feedback
and I have an updated patch (not yet posted) but I'm
All,
I've recently come back to bug 64338
(https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64338) which is an
enhancement I filed back in 2020 with a patch. I got some good feedback
and I have an updated patch (not yet posted) but I'm finding that while
there are no errors or crashes, the
Jon,
On 7/8/22 13:52, jonmcalexander.wellsfargo.com via dev wrote:
Another dumb question: I've been assuming we are talking about:
client (e.g. browser) -> mod_proxy -> Tomcat -> application
The application on Tomcat does the communicating to SiteMinder with
the credentials from the .fcc
oxying, only reverse-proxying.
But the error message suggests that this has nothing to do with the
connection from httpd / mod_proxy -> Tomcat.
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 10:03 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod-proxy with
Jon,
On 7/7/22 16:56, jonmcalexander.wellsfargo.com via dev wrote:
Seem to have an issue with mod-proxy and making the JSESSIONID and the
SMSESSION cookie sticky. How can this be done? This setup was working
with mod-jk, but when moving to mod-proxy over https it’s not working.
We are
Eric,
On 5/18/22 08:31, Eric Covener wrote:
Given the above, I believe the interpretation of X-F5-Auth-Token should
be that it is an end-to-end header, and should therefore NOT be removed
from the proxied request.
The text does say "All other headers *defined by HTTP/1.1* are
end-to-end
All,
I've been doing some reading about the recently-publicized Big-IP
vulnerability and I was wondering if httpd is doing the right thing.
According to Randori's analysis[1] of the flaw, there is confusion
between Apache httpd and Jetty (introduced by Big-IP) as to which
component is
All,
On 12/14/21 14:25, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
I work with the Developer Best Practices Working Group of the
Linux Foundation's Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF)
>
> [snip]
>
We'd like to give your project *free* MFA hardware tokens from Google
and GitHub, for use by your maintainers.
Stefan,
On 9/23/21 09:52, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
Am 23.09.2021 um 15:51 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
On 9/23/21 3:44 PM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
Author: icing
Date: Thu Sep 23 13:44:58 2021
New Revision: 1893563
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1893563=rev
Log:
* mod_http2: fix
Jim,
On 10/29/20 10:04, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone hacking away on httpd and/or APR w/ Xcode 12? On my system at least it
is throwing errors about -Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration, and not
enabling IPv6:
checking if APR supports IPv6... no -- no working getaddrinfo
also likely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 7/24/20 17:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hey there, Chris;
>
> Fair question - and I don't think I have a handy link describing
> the flow of patch -> trunk -> STATUS backport proposal -> branch
> commit -> release
>
> Generally speaking,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 7/22/20 19:32, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all; It's been a while since we've rolled a release and gotten
> fixes/etc in our community's hands. Apologies for not suggesting
> this sooner. How about a T Friday? That will let vote run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Rainer,
On 4/13/20 18:02, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 13.04.2020 um 23:27 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:21 PM Christopher Schultz
>> > <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>> wrote:
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
William,
On 4/13/20 17:27, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:21 PM Christopher Schultz
> <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>
> Wil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
William,
On 4/13/20 15:30, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 11:41 Eric Covener <mailto:cove...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 12:19 PM Christopher Schultz
> <mailto:ch...@christ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I'm having some trouble building 2.4.x directly from svn.
MacOS 10.14.6 (Mojave)
$ autoconf -V
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69
$ glibtool --version
glibtool (GNU libtool) 2.4.6
[ installed via "brew install libtool" ]
$ cc --version
Apple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric,
On 4/10/20 15:56, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> Note: If you move to r->notes (also a table) you can use
>>> apr_table_setn to pass a casted pointer and retrieve the
>>> pointer on the other side. But this is probably a last
>>> resort.
>>
>> I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric,
On 4/10/20 14:45, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 2:36 PM Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> All,
>>
>> First-time ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
First-time httpd hacker, here. I'm looking at:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64338
I've found that around line 637 of mod_proxy_balancer.c it looks like
I just need to poke a value into the r->subprocess_env like this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 12/29/16 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> Cc: dev list. Looks like a catch?
(my reply might be bounced from the dev@ list... I don't think I'm
subscribed)
> On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 17:44 -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote:
21 matches
Mail list logo
