Graham,
On 5/8/23 05:29, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
On 04 May 2023, at 09:34, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from
Subversion to Git.
This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
via svn.apache.org. It
will be available via Git at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd-site.git
and https://github.com/apache/httpd.git.
Github also offers the possibility to use a Subversion client:
https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/working-with-subversion-on-github/support-for-subversion-clients
[ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the
features of Github (for now Actions and PR).
[ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git, but I don't want to
work with Github and I will only work with
what gitbox.apache.org offers.
[X]: Leave everything as is.
I would rather see proper SVN integration with Github. This is a vote of no
confidence in our own projects.
I don't see it as an anti-NIH vote or anything like that.
git simply has a bunch of superior features, behaviors, etc. that
Subversion simply will never have, regardless of any commitment of their
development team. Sure, the svn team could replicate git, but since git
already exists, why not use it?
-chris
