adly hurt by a few WebDAV clients proactively
exploring the filesystem using locksdiscovery. That compeltely killed the
service. I introduced the DavLockDiscovery directive to work it around.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
TTP.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
Github and I will only work with
> what gitbox.apache.org offers.
> [X]: Leave everything as is.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:29:28AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> Does your config have directives from dav_fs in two overlapping sections?
Like this, you mean?
DavQuota
DavQuota None
DavQuota 222
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
not sure
that matters here, since merge_dir_config() should handle all directives
and it is not called at all.
What is the trick? I have spent a lot of time with printfs in server/config.c
with no success so far.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
peration and is intended only for display and logging
> purposes.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 04:15:16PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > Do you suggests adding values to Options, or to create a DAVoptions
> > directive?
>
> I think DAVMSextis fine, but with an Options like syntax.
Hence for now this?
DAVMSext +WDV
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:53:47AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> I like the third case with an all/on option. If it will need to be
> per-directory, maybe an Options like syntax would make sense?
Do you suggests adding values to Options, or to create a DAVoptions
directive?
--
Emmanuel D
extensions.
Thoughts?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:37:37AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> svn relocate http://svn.apache.org https://svn.apache.org
That did it! I made the commit, but someone knowledgable should
probably check I did not break something
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
3: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E195023: Changing directory '/scratch/httpd-trunk/httpd/branches/2.4.x' is
forbidden by the server
svn: E175013: Access to '/repos/asf/!svn/me' forbidden
I do svn commit --username manu --password ***
What am I doing wrong?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
1904638,1904662,1905170,1905206,1905230 ^/httpd/h
ttpd/trunk .
+1: manu, covener, gbechis
covener: xml needs doc tweak after backport
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
nfo.filetype != APR_REG)
goto out;
apr_brigade_printf(bb, NULL, NULL,
"%016" APR_UINT64_T_HEX_FMT, rr->finfo.size);
ap_set_content_type(r, "multipart/MSDAVEXTPrefixEncoded");
ap_pass_brigade(r->output_filters, bb);
/* plain GET rocessing happens afterward */
out:
if (rr)
ap_destroy_sub_req(rr);
return;
}
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
anism to ensure propfind data does not change between the two
times it is produced. I am not sure that can be guaranteed.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
Hello
I made some progress with the combined GET+PROPFIND specified
by MS-WDV (for a summary, see
https://lists.apache.org/thread/57s1vvl6k9qpdv5ym7mtcl29bd933w7k )
Attached is the diff against trunk, form comments.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
Index: dav/main/mod_dav.c
: manu
+
PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
*) core: avoid duplicate headers when using ap_send_error_response.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:12:09AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> I will let someone review xml changes in r1905230 before committing
> the html files.
I committed the html files.
What is the procedure for pushing changes to the 2.4 branch?
I have the following changes for DAVLockDis
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:19:47AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> Typically the change to the xml file and the updated html files are committed
> separately e.g. look at
I will let someone review xml changes in r1905230 before committing
the html files.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
.c (working copy)
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
conf = (dav_dir_conf *)apr_pcalloc(p, sizeof(*conf));
-conf->allow_lockdiscovery = DAV_ENABLED_ON;
+conf->allow_lockdiscovery = DAV_ENABLED_UNSET;
/* clean up the directory to remove any trailing slash */
if (dir != NULL)
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:19:47AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> Would you provide some documentation for the new directive
Yes, this is pending.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 01:05:28PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Welcome Emmanuel, glad to have you on the team!
Thank you everybody for the grretings. I made my first
commit in r1905170, I hope it is fine.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
covery by PROPFIND is another story, I cannot see
a use case for that.
If you want to see less locks, then you must be great fan of my
DAVLockDiscovery contribution, especially now it has been updated
as a flag directive. Any chance we get it into 2.4 branch?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 05:03:48PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> dbm is fast once you have it open. mod_dav_fs opens DAVLockDB on each
> HTTP request, then it acquire a filesystem level lock on it. This is
> where contenton occurs.
I have been thinking about how Apache could open
w_bug.cgi?id=66313
Is it fine for you?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
t would be fine too. I was too focused on a specific client's client
behavior that expr on User-Agent and remote IP seemed critical to me,
but indeed acheive the same result.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
s very fast. I'd be surprised that contention occurs in
> any typical workload.
dbm is fast once you have it open. mod_dav_fs opens DAVLockDB on each
HTTP request, then it acquire a filesystem level lock on it. This is
where contenton occurs.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
.
I have been testing disabling lock discovery for a week, it works well.
Performances are good again, and no regression appeared.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
is interested. Feedback are welcome.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
else
did the same work and got it committed in tree:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60708
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
of request, and hence miss
the next brigades.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
Hello
This contribution has not met an enthousiast reaction. No comment, anyone?
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:05:48PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Hello
>
> If you tried to use mod_dav_fs with recent MS Office on Windows,
> you probably had the unpleaseant experience of be
-modules_aaa_mod_auth_form.c
[4] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60908
[5] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60909
[6] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60708
[7] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60910
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
is first done without credentials, hits a HTTP 401 and then
succeeds with credentials.
With the help of a session, all requests after initial HTTP basic
authentication have a session cookie and can succeed on first attempt,
saving one HTTP request/response.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http
33 matches
Mail list logo
