On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 04 Jun 2010, at 2:51 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+1 for the continued, and perhaps more widespread, voluntary soliciting of
approval in advance for changes which add new modules or other significant
new function, or make
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
Reading the feedback on the modules list I posted got me into thinking:
1) Should static module linking be still the default for httpd building?
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Wednesday 02 June 2010, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I have updated my patch to the latest trunk and to use the variant
where the module for logging is selected with APLOG_USE_MODULE and
AP_DECLARE_MODULE macros:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
which are either pure bug fixes or pretty trivial. I will create a new
patch series without these soon, hopefully tomorrow.
Appreciate your
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 03 Jun 2010, at 10:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It would be, but it's necessary. The ASF is a collaborative environment;
unreviewed code should not released, even when the authors are committers.
A major patch
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
Thanks very much for all the responses. There is strong consensus for
retaining support for some varieties of 0.9.8 and possibly some 0.9.7.
A new RFC, then, for trunk/2.3 and beyond:
- support and build warning-free with
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Sander Temme scte...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 2, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
tags are cheap. If soon after 2.3.6 I need to do a 2.3.7
then I'm alright with that ;)
slightly
2010/5/25 Torsten Förtsch torsten.foert...@gmx.net:
Hi,
flood_farm.c contains these lines for almost 9 years (since Revision 89675):
#if 0 /* this gets uncommented after apr_thread_exit() fixes are commited */
apr_thread_exit(thd, APR_SUCCESS);
#endif
Are those fixes committed now?
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:49:33AM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Is there any easy way to run this for 2.0.x ?
The test suite should run for 2.0 just the same as for 2.2, though there
may be many more test failures. Is it
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to drop support for versions of OpenSSL older than 1.0 in the
trunk mod_ssl. We have 200+ lines of compat macro junk and still six
different compiler warnings remain in a trunk build against 1.0.0.
pro: simplify
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Sunday 23 May 2010, Sander Temme wrote:
On May 23, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This seems to fail with non shared builds of mpms:
Fixed in r947563
How can the Test framework find out whether the MPM has
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:33 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 5/17/2010 9:15 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
mod_mutex looks fine to me, but I'm not so happy that we're optimizing
the situation for unbundled modules that want to use a new API with
old 2.2.x, at the expense
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:30:29PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
The multiple-calls-to-pool_clear solution is definitely safer.
OK, so now I reviewed that too ;) The only difference between:
apr_pool_clear(ptrans
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
Hi, all;
As requested, here is an SVN diff of the STATUS file to backport this bug
into 2.2.x. I'm going to try with the attachment, though the apache.org mail
servers have kicked me a few times for that in the past
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 5/4/2010 2:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Here's a backport vote to 2.2 for your consideration;
It is far too painful to adopt the new Mutex directive for modules targeting
httpd 2.2 and future 2.3. The
mod_fcgid unfortunately allows the FcgidWrapper directive to be
overridden in htaccess when AllowOverride FileInfo is declared. In
all likelihood some users need that (the feature was contributed and
added in mod_fcgid 2.1, it is especially handy to tweak PHP settings),
but definitely some admins
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Saturday 01 May 2010, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I would like to see some buy-in for the API changes. I don't have
any other concerns about committing. (Logging is such a part of
main-line that many more people will see
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Philip M. Gollucci
pgollu...@p6m7g8.com wrote:
Any objections to this in trunk / branches/2.2.x ?
Since the last apxs change was handled in an unexpected manner, I'll
take a moment to state the (perhaps) obvious:
Trunk is CTR, but it is fine, even dandy, to
, avoiding orphaned callback pointers.
[Brett Gervasoni brettg senseofsecurity.com, Jeff Trawick]
+ *) prefork MPM: Run cleanups for final request when process exits
gracefully.
+ PR 43857. [Tom Donovan, Jeff Trawick]
+
*) ab: fix number of requests sent by ab when keepalive
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:28 PM, pgollu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pgollucci
Date: Wed May 12 23:28:53 2010
New Revision: 943749
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=943749view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:47:59PM -, Jeff Trawick wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/prefork/prefork.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/prefork/prefork.c Mon May 10 20:47:59 2010
@@ -549,12 +549,6
(GCD as in Grand Central Dispatch)
See http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/libdispatch-dev/2010-May/000352.html
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files
with Lua code (LuaHookX) and 8 more for adding the same hooks using
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:41 PM, pgollu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pgollucci
Date: Fri May 7 20:41:38 2010
New Revision: 942210
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=942210view=rev
Log:
- Backports r942209
This needs a real change log. Generally you just include the original
change
in this Perl source
file. And comparing with 0 instead of $[ is understandable to more people.
On May 6, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
2010/5/6 Torsten Förtsch torsten.foert...@gmx.net:
On Thursday 06 May 2010 13:53:37 tech_list wrote:
[ error] '/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs -q
anything.
--
Liebe Grüße aus Freilassing,
Michael Rack
Am 04.05.2010 15:29, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Michael Rackm...@michaelrack.de wrote:
Dear Jeff,
the CGI-Script does not contain any FastCGI spezific changes. The same
file
is used for CGI and FastCGI
,
Michael Rack
Am 03.05.2010 22:09, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Michael Rackm...@michaelrack.de wrote:
Strange UPDATE (Please take a seat) ;-)
I have checkouted the SVN Trunk of mod_fcgid, compiled and installed.
Now there is a very strange behavior.
I
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Here's a backport vote to 2.2 for your consideration;
It is far too painful to adopt the new Mutex directive for modules targeting
httpd 2.2 and future 2.3.
From your example URL below, it looks like a developer
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Here's a backport vote to 2.2 for your consideration;
It is far too painful to adopt the new Mutex directive for modules targeting
httpd 2.2
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
The solution, I believe, is to provide the mutex
directive for all
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Rack m...@michaelrack.de wrote:
Dear Apache-Developer-List,
i have some stupid issues with my current configuration:
us...@httpd.apache.org would be better (I'll fix the mod_fcgid
subproject page to clarify)
* fcgid 2.3.5
* Apache 2.2.15
* suEXEC
i
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
I was looking at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301
which asks for a way to distinguish in the log whether a connection was
aborted by the web server or the other end. To do that, we'd need to
note
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Michael Rack m...@michaelrack.de wrote:
Strange UPDATE (Please take a seat) ;-)
I have checkouted the SVN Trunk of mod_fcgid, compiled and installed.
Now there is a very strange behavior.
I still get the 500 Internal Sever Error, but suexec shows up the line
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Monday 12 April 2010, Jeff Trawick wrote:
attached are some compile fixes
Thanks Jeff, I will include those fixes in the next round of patches.
It seems I should enable more modules when doing my testing.
How
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dan Poirier
Sent: Freitag, 30. April 2010 13:41
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stop accepting PRs for 1.3?
On 2010-04-29 at 23:13, Sander Temme
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Tasos Andras kho...@gmail.com wrote:
I really wonder why you Apache guys did this:
A news from 2004:
http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/07/1621254
It is 2010 now, and we're still on Apache 1.3.29. What was that license
problem?
With all due
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what
are you using?
You raise interesting questions about what the
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Weedy weedy2...@gmail.com wrote:
Can the SIGTERM be logged? Just to see how long it takes?
The patches attached add extra logging to the error scan.
1. report_graceful_terminations.txt
It logs the number of processes receiving SIGTERM every time the error
scan
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
(sorry for the cross-post but httpd-trunk and APR are now so
entwined that its required)...
OK... I've been playing around with building httpd-trunk
on Linux and I've been having troubles left and right (using
the 1.4
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
(sorry for the cross-post but httpd-trunk and APR are now so
entwined that its required)...
OK
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Brian J. France br...@brianfrance.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:08 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/23/2010 9:03 AM, Brian J. France wrote:
You can build a module that is able to insert a trailer by adding a filter
and ap_hook_create_request call.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:04 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Fri Apr 23 17:04:40 2010
New Revision: 937378
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=937378view=rev
Log:
FcgidPassHeader now maps header names to environment variable names
in the usual manner: The header name
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Weedy weedy2...@gmail.com wrote:
For the life of me I can't seem to find a way to make mod_fcgid wait
longer. I don't mean FcgidMaxRequestsPerProcess or
FcgidProcessLifeTime. I mean what controls the time between the signal
-2/-11/-15/whatever and the -9.
Any
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Keeping zombies cleaned up requires a small scan interval, but that
can keep some scripts from having adequate time to terminate before
getting KILL-ed.
whoops, ignore that; I'm getting scans confused
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:51 PM, rbo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rbowen
Date: Thu Apr 22 20:51:56 2010
New Revision: 937055
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=937055view=rev
Log:
Working example configuration, thanks to Paul.
Modified:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Steven B ste...@teamholistic.com wrote:
Somehow there was a decision made that changed max PHP processes from
per-user to per-vhost between the old mod_fcgid and the newer 2.3.5 version.
Maybe this is the commit? (before mod_fcgid development moved here
but
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Darren Garvey darren.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2010 13:39, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Darren Garvey darren.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31 March 2010 15:49, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Darren Garvey darren.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2010 13:39, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Darren Garvey darren.gar...@gmail.com
wrote
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
On 13.04.2010 16:58, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Apr 13 14:58:03 2010
New Revision: 933657
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933657view=rev
Log:
generalize the existing (r589761) platform-
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/per-module-loglevel-v3/
...
or the complete patch:
per-module-loglevel-v3.patch
attached are some compile fixes
(still looking, haven't tested yet)
patch
Description: Binary data
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, b...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bjh
Date: Mon Apr 12 18:12:43 2010
New Revision: 933341
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933341view=rev
Log:
Remove usage of the APR private function apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout(),
replacing it with the newly added
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Darren Garvey darren.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 March 2010 15:49, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:05 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/31/2010 5:41 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Petr Hracek phrac...@gmail.com wrote:
I have found another strange thing:
During the compilation I have found that it failed because of
XtOffsetOf is missing and on the UnixWare I did not find any header where it
could be mentioned.
Could you please help me
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Petr Hracek phrac...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunatelly I do not have apr on the system.
Do you know where I can get them?
since you have a working httpd 2.2.14, you have apr already
what happens when you try to build your module with apxs?
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/31/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Why not just change the signature of ap_process_resource_config() ?
What is the anticipated use of these functions? (IOW, how much pain
does it introduce?)
I see
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Darren Garvey darren.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying out the latest mod_fcgid and having some good results; good
to see it back in apache-proper.
FWLIW, it never was in apache-proper until now. (ISTR seeing some
discussion of mod_fastcgi in
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:05 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/31/2010 5:41 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Darren Garvey darren.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying out the latest mod_fcgid and having some good results; good
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:04 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Wed Mar 31 19:04:34 2010
New Revision: 929663
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=929663view=rev
Log:
Add the missing header file from r928916.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/include/http_config.h
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:53 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Mar 23 17:53:27 2010
New Revision: 117
Log:
text/plain for easy viewing in browser
Modified:
release/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.0.63/CVE-2010-0425.patch (props changed)
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:16 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/24/2010 6:21 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:53 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Mar 23 17:53:27 2010
New Revision: 117
Log:
text/plain for easy viewing in browser
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I can currently reproduce the following problem with 2.2.15 event MPM under
high load:
When an httpd child process gets closed due to the max spare threads rule
and it holds established client connections for which it
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 23.03.2010 13:34, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
I can currently reproduce the following problem with 2.2.15 event MPM
under
high load:
When
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Thomas, Peter ptho...@hpti.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 5:59 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fighting with build process 2.2.x on Sparc Solaris 10
What if
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the
coming days? These security issues aught to be addressed, and while
we are at it, it just seems like a nice thing to do as we get closer
to some
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the
coming days? These security issues aught to be addressed, and while
we
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
here is the second version of my patch to allow per-module loglevel
configuration. It's available at:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/per-module-loglevel-v2/
Any thoughts about allowing the conn_rec to hold a logging config
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi,
here is the second version of my patch to allow per-module loglevel
configuration. It's available at:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/per-module-loglevel-v2/
(another tangent based on a quick browse of your patches)
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Yonts, Richard
richard.yo...@smss.sony.com wrote:
An Apache server was misconfigured where a LoadModule directive was inside a
VirtualHost *:444 definition. I have found a smattering of documentation
saying that the LoadModule must be in the server context,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 19 Mar 2010, at 6:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
LoadFile and LoadModule should both ensure that they're coded at
global scope, or report a configuration error. That logic was added
to the 1.3 branch but lost in 2.0
send e-mail to dev-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Pranav Bhat dev.pb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:49 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Mar 12 18:49:26 2010
New Revision: 922392
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=922392view=rev
Log:
reduce the warning level in the bindprocessor() call used to make sure child
processes aren't bound to
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
- mod_rewrite doesn't seem to support the concept of directive inheritance,
so the moment you specify RewriteEngine on, any inherited config -
including your RewriteLog directive - gets blown out the window.
don't forget
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:24 AM, rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Thu Mar 11 13:24:41 2010
New Revision: 921839
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921839view=rev
Log:
* Vote
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Can someone point me to information on how to autogen API docs from the
source? The link on the website points to something purportedly by Ian
Holmsman, but the link is dead.
Does make dox work for you?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Can someone point me to information on how to autogen API docs from the
source? The link
* Commit /dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.0.63/CVE-2008-2364-patch-2.0.txt:
SECURITY: CVE-2008-2364 (cve.mitre.org)
mod_proxy_http: Better handling of excessive interim responses
from origin server to prevent potential denial of service and high
memory usage.
+1: trawick, wrowe
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:47 PM, simon simon netos...@gmail.com wrote:
hi there,
I am using ap_setup_client_block() and ap_get_client_block() methods of API
to read POST request, Request body is being read properly, but there is
another module waiting these data, it never receive it (also use
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Mar 9 11:52:32 2010
New Revision: 113
Log:
For 2.0 patch available, note different line numbers
I will continue working on the related vulnerabilities-httpd.xml
update unless you've already started ;)
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:45 AM, simon simon netos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Many thanks for the tip
I have two modules, one have received the body with ap_get_client_block()(I
have no source), it handle the content,
the other one need dispatch the original body to some servers.
so, I
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
I just noticed this at http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi:
The Apache HTTP Server Project is pleased to announce the release of
Apache HTTP Server, version 2.3.5-alpha. This release represents ten
years of innovation
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hm, on closer inspection it seems the high memory
usage we're seeing is common to both 2.3.5 and 2.2.12,
so it's likely an mod_mbox issue, which is probably infra's
ball of wax to deal with.
Looking at backtraces from
On Monday, March 8, 2010, Kevac Marko ma...@kevac.org wrote:
If someone is still interested, I can update bug with newer patch in a few
days.
Please do.
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:06 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Sun Mar 7 10:06:46 2010
New Revision: 101
Log:
axe BOM (maybe Safari will display it now?)
yep
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:41 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Sat Mar 6 07:41:31 2010
New Revision: 94
Log:
minor tweaks, especially to mention continued compatibility with APR 1.3
Modified:
dev/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
dev/httpd/Announcement2.2.txt
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/3/2010 2:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I guess filling in the EXTENSION_CONTROL_BLOCK with their addresses is
not the only way an app gets addressibility .../?
Oh, hold up. I think you are right
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:53 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/5/2010 12:16 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On 3/3/2010 2:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I guess filling in the EXTENSION_CONTROL_BLOCK
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:55 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Anyone looking at the changelog should be terrified of adopting 2.2.15; I'm
going
to modify it thusly (please correct attributions if needed?);
*) SECURITY: CVE-2009-3555 (cve.mitre.org)
mod_ssl:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/3/2010 1:49 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Mar 3 19:49:41 2010
New Revision: 918665
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=918665view=rev
Log:
fix these warnings:
mod_isapi.c:488:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:09 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Candidate at the usual /dev/dist/ URL; Your votes please...
It is worth pointing out that
* httpd 2.2.15 bundles APR 1.4.2 but continues to support APR 1.3.x.
* Solaris users of httpd with unbundled APR 1.3.9 should
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:09 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Candidate at the usual /dev/dist/ URL; Your votes please...
+/-1
[+1] Release 2.2.15
Solaris 10 U5/x86, Sun Studio, 32-bit and 64-bit builds, latest httpd
test suite successful (skipped tests for case_filter[_in],
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:25 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sun Feb 28 17:25:44 2010
New Revision: 917211
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917211view=rev
Log:
Backport mod_reqtimeout from trunk.
Reviewed by: sf, jorton, rjung
To take trawick's comment into account, I
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:49:44AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:31:36AM -, Graham Leggett wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_io.c (original)
+++
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Tue Feb 9 12:46:17 2010
New Revision: 908015
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=908015view=rev
Log:
* modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c (ssl_cmd_SSLInsecureRenegotiation):
Tweak error wording for when the
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Gregg L. Smith li...@glewis.com wrote:
Shouldn't this be a B?
What's one more compiler warning among friends :-)
Fixed/thanks!
wr...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=906612view=rev
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:55:38PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl
Does it build on a properly set up Visual Studio + httpd trunk +
apr-*? I wouldn't know, but if somebody can tell me that it does in a
reasonable manner then I'll commit.
Index: os/win32/BaseAddr.ref
===
--- os/win32/BaseAddr.ref
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I'd like to move ahead and catch up to OpenSSL 0.9.8m which was released
today,
and that requires a 2.2 release.
Let's start a three day clock to the tag, and I'll tag Sunday about noon CST.
That gives folks
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 2/22/2010 11:16 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Mon Feb 22 17:16:29 2010
New Revision: 912666
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=912666view=rev
Log:
Fix startup segfault when the
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Marcus Merz mm...@gmx.de wrote:
Well, it's been a while but as i want other people to find a solution should
they dig in old archives via Google,
Thanks for the good summary.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Jonathan Petersson
jonathan.peters...@binero.se wrote:
Upgrading to mod_fcgid-nightly I noticed the nice addition of mod_fcgid
status in server-status. Looking at this I noticed that
DefaultMaxClassProcessCount is set per vhost rather than per user.
Is there
901 - 1000 of 3135 matches
Mail list logo
