On Tuesday 29 March 2016 07:26:06, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> > I am not against the freebind feature as such, it's useful for
> > failover solutions/VRRP/etc. But I am strictly against advertising
> > this as a workaround for broken systemd design.
>
> We do not advertise it publicly as a workaround for
On 03/28/2016 05:52 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Monday 07 March 2016 12:41:25, Jan Kaluža wrote:
This is needed for httpd startup with systemd when one wants to use
particular IP address to bind. There is no way how to start httpd
after the IP address has been configured in systemd and accordin
On Monday 07 March 2016 12:41:25, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> This is needed for httpd startup with systemd when one wants to use
> particular IP address to bind. There is no way how to start httpd
> after the IP address has been configured in systemd and according
> to systemd developers, the applications
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> I've implemented the way described in that question above ^. Please see the
> attached patch and share your opinions.
>
> The syntax to enable IP_FREEBIND currently is:
>
> Listen 192.168.0.1:80 http freebind
I think we should be able to conf
Thx. I'll take a deeper look post 2.4.19 (this week)
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 4:36 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> On 03/08/2016 11:43 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža
On 03/08/2016 11:43 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 03/08/2016 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
I have chosen FreeListen over the flags
FWIW, should be take the YAD path, I'd prefer ListenFree (over
On 03/08/2016 10:47 AM, Tim Bannister wrote:
>> On 8 Mar 2016, at 18:13, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> If a websocket implementation is properly stacked on top of the
>> core, there is no need for special-casing this interaction. It
>> will be able to speak over http or https, or conceivably even o
> On 8 Mar 2016, at 18:13, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Tim Bannister
>> wrote:
>> On 8 Mar 2016, at 10:43, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>> > On 03/08/2016 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Tim Bannister
wrote:
> On 8 Mar 2016, at 10:43, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> > On 03/08/2016 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> I have chosen FreeLi
On 8 Mar 2016, at 10:43, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
I have chosen FreeListen over the flags
>>>
>>> FWIW, should be take the YAD path, I'd p
On 8 Mar 2016, at 09:25, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>>>
>>> I have chosen FreeListen over the flags
>>
>> FWIW, should be take the YAD path, I'd prefer ListenFree (over
>> FreeListen) to emphasize
On 03/08/2016 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
I have chosen FreeListen over the flags
FWIW, should be take the YAD path, I'd prefer ListenFree (over
FreeListen) to emphasize on the "Listen dir
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> This is needed for httpd startup with systemd when one wants to use
> particular IP address to bind. There is no way how to start httpd after the
> IP address has been configured in systemd and according to systemd
> developers, the applicatio
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>>
>> I have chosen FreeListen over the flags
>
> FWIW, should be take the YAD path, I'd prefer ListenFree (over
> FreeListen) to emphasize on the "Listen directive family" with a
> prefix...
T
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> I have chosen FreeListen over the flags
FWIW, should be take the YAD path, I'd prefer ListenFree (over
FreeListen) to emphasize on the "Listen directive family" with a
prefix...
Regards,
Yann.
On 03/08/2016 06:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Mar 7, 2016 21:59, "Yehuda Katz" mailto:yeh...@ymkatz.net>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr
mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2016 13:54, "Jan Kaluža" mailto:jkal...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >
>
On Mar 7, 2016 21:59, "Yehuda Katz" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2016 13:54, "Jan Kaluža" wrote:
>> >
>> > On 03/07/2016 04:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it
>> >> be possibl
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2016 13:54, "Jan Kaluža" wrote:
> >
> > On 03/07/2016 04:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it
> >> be possible to somehow leverage Listen itself, maybe with some
> >
On Mar 7, 2016 13:54, "Jan Kaluža" wrote:
>
> On 03/07/2016 04:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it
>> be possible to somehow leverage Listen itself, maybe with some
>> sort of flag?
>
>
> Yes, that would be quite possible. I was thinking a
On 03/07/2016 04:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it
be possible to somehow leverage Listen itself, maybe with some
sort of flag?
Yes, that would be quite possible. I was thinking about that way, but I
have chosen YAD as a first approach. If
Intstead of adding YAD (yet another directive ;) ), would it
be possible to somehow leverage Listen itself, maybe with some
sort of flag?
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> attached patch adds new "FreeListen" directive. The difference between
> "Listen" and "FreeListe
Hi,
attached patch adds new "FreeListen" directive. The difference between
"Listen" and "FreeListen" is that "FreeListen" sets the IP_FREEBIND
socket option on platforms where this is available.
It is therefore possible to start the server even when particular IP
address set in the "FreeList
22 matches
Mail list logo
