On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:20:44PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
I think 90% of folks on this list did, me included. Was there
interpretive dance?
One lightning talk had some, uh, interpretive poetry though. ;-) -- justin
You're not really serious about this are you? It is a little
premature to rename something to 'd' that is still very much 'httpd'.
Get the code in place first and then see if it makes sense to worry
about trivial things like renaming the binary.
Brad
On 12/14/2005 at 1:21:20 pm, in message
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Brad Nicholes
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2005 16:39
An:
Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Rename to Apache D
You're not really serious about this are you? It is a
little premature to rename something to 'd' that is still
very much 'httpd
Brad Nicholes wrote:
You're not really serious about this are you? It is a little
premature to rename something to 'd' that is still very much 'httpd'.
Get the code in place first and then see if it makes sense to worry
about trivial things like renaming the binary.
While I don't have
--On December 15, 2005 8:39:01 AM -0700 Brad Nicholes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're not really serious about this are you? It is a little
You must have missed Paul's lightning talk at AC. =) -- justin
{
On 12/15/2005 at 2:17:45 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On December 15, 2005 8:39:01 AM -0700 Brad Nicholes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're not really serious about this are you? It is a little
You must have missed Paul's lightning talk at AC. =) --
--On December 15, 2005 4:34:19 PM -0700 Brad Nicholes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I was there. I just assumed that it was the beer talking.
I'd go with your first assumption. =) -- justin
On Dec 15, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On December 15, 2005 8:39:01 AM -0700 Brad Nicholes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're not really serious about this are you? It is a little
You must have missed Paul's lightning talk at AC. =) -- justin
I think 90% of folks on
The attached patch is just a start, fixing the configure.in to generate
the correct binary name by default.
-Paul
Index: configure.in
===
--- configure.in(revision 355792)
+++ configure.in(working copy)
@@ -527,7
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:21:20PM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
The attached patch is just a start, fixing the configure.in to generate
the correct binary name by default.
+1
It's great for marketting reasons too, we can use Apache'd and be all
cool and stuff.
--
Colm MacCárthaigh
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:21:20PM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
- progname=httpd] )
+ progname=d] )
Looks good although I wonder wether it wouldn't be better to go for
+ progname=D] )
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:21:20PM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
- progname=httpd] )
+ progname=d] )
Looks good although I wonder wether it wouldn't be better to go for
+ progname=D] )
I wondered if we were a big 'D' or a little 'd' as well. +1 on your
patch :-)
david
+1 so long as HTTP is actually getting removed from core.
-wsv
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
The attached patch is just a start, fixing the configure.in to
generate
the correct binary name by default.
-Paul
Index: configure.in
13 matches
Mail list logo
