On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:55:48AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> As I said a LONG time ago. I'm not veto'ing this change. That doesn't
> mean I can't gripe about it. I am sick and tired of going back and forth
> over issues that were decided years ago.
And I am sick and tired of hearing about thi
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 01:58 am, Greg Stein wrote:
As I said a LONG time ago. I'm not veto'ing this change. That doesn't
mean I can't gripe about it. I am sick and tired of going back and forth
over issues that were decided years ago.
Ryan
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:38:25PM -0700, Ju
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:38:25PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>...
> Since there is a veto against the use of SIGWINCH by default, the
> current code in CVS is broken. I would like to resolve this
> before we tag and roll again. -- justin
By definition, it must be resolved before the nex
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:23:14AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> Forcing people to use SIGUSR1on a platform that has co-opted that signal
> is broken.
Obviously, that wouldn't work. My patch allowed SIGWINCH to be used on
Linux 2.0 while switching the default to be SIGUSR1 on sane platforms.
Your
ubject: [PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0
> This should resolve Roy's veto by switching back to SIGUSR1 for
> graceful restarts (except on Linux 2.0 with glibc 2.0).
>
> As I don't think you can veto a veto (call a vote?), I don't think
> his
On Monday 17 September 2001 11:15 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:07:13AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Monday 17 September 2001 11:04 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >
> > I know what the mails were about. I am simply stating that it is still
> > completely bogus.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:01:40PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > As I don't think you can veto a veto (call a vote?), I don't think
> > his veto can be overriden.
>
> Nope; he has to be convinced to retract it. :-)
Maybe we should wait until he can speak for himself.
-aaron
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:07:13AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2001 11:04 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> I know what the mails were about. I am simply stating that it is still completely
> bogus.
I disagree.
It should be SIGUSR1 everywhere. As a compromise, I allowed c
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> This is completely BOGUS! If I have a farm of web servers
> running on different platforms, all of the signals should
> be the same.
Oh, bah. 'Windows.' 'VMS.' 'MacOS' (not OS X). I agree
with Sander that the thing that should be the same is the supported
commands to ma
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 September 2001 19:58
> On Monday 17 September 2001 10:53 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> This is completely BOGUS! If I have a farm of web servers running
> on different
> platforms, all of the signals should
On Monday 17 September 2001 11:04 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I know what the mails were about. I am simply stating that it is still completely
bogus.
Ryan
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 10:57:32AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > This is completely BOGUS! If I have a farm of web servers running on
>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 10:57:32AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> This is completely BOGUS! If I have a farm of web servers running on different
> platforms, all of the signals should be the same.
Roy's -1 on SIGWINCH:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3e
Roy's comment on making it configurable:
http:[EMAIL
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> This should resolve Roy's veto by switching back to SIGUSR1 for
> graceful restarts (except on Linux 2.0 with glibc 2.0).
>
> As I don't think you can veto a veto (call a vote?), I don't think
> his veto can be overriden.
Nope; he has to be convinced to retract it.
On Monday 17 September 2001 10:53 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
This is completely BOGUS! If I have a farm of web servers running on different
platforms, all of the signals should be the same.
Ryan
> This should resolve Roy's veto by switching back to SIGUSR1 for
> graceful restarts (except on L
This should resolve Roy's veto by switching back to SIGUSR1 for
graceful restarts (except on Linux 2.0 with glibc 2.0).
As I don't think you can veto a veto (call a vote?), I don't think
his veto can be overriden. But, I do want to post this before I
commit it as it is a widespread change and I
15 matches
Mail list logo